From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, sdf@fomichev.me, zhuyifei@google.com,
mattbobrowski@google.com, 2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] Add validation for bpf_set_retval helper
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:00:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178070041689.3950549.14630927515894773480.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605140243.664590-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 14:02:40 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>
> The bpf_set_retval() helper is used by cgroup BPF programs to set the
> return value of the kernel hook. The argument type for this helper is
> ARG_ANYTHING. This allows setting a positive value, which no cgroup
> hook expects and can cause issues, such as the kernel panic reported
> in [1].
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v5,1/3] selftests/bpf: Restrict bpf_set_retval argument in sk_bypass_prot_mem
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6fa2839893e3
- [bpf-next,v5,2/3] bpf: Add validation for bpf_set_retval argument
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b1f7f67b74c2
- [bpf-next,v5,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_set_retval validation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7913cdb54ee3
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 14:02 Xu Kuohai
2026-06-05 14:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] selftests/bpf: Restrict bpf_set_retval argument in sk_bypass_prot_mem Xu Kuohai
2026-06-05 15:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 14:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] bpf: Add validation for bpf_set_retval argument Xu Kuohai
2026-06-05 15:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-06 10:02 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-06-05 14:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_set_retval validation Xu Kuohai
2026-06-05 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178070041689.3950549.14630927515894773480.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=zhuyifei@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®