mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zaitsev <pz@spylog.ru>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re[2]: MMAP vs READ/WRITE
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:27:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1781804867952.20020314122715@spylog.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020313164158.A1219@namesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <861732271654.20020313161718@spylog.ru> <20020313164158.A1219@namesys.com>

Hello Oleg,

Wednesday, March 13, 2002, 4:41:58 PM, you wrote:

OD> Hello!

OD> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:17:18PM +0300, Peter Zaitsev wrote:
>>   So I would say mmap is not really optimized nowdays in Linux and so
>>   read() may be wining in cases it should not. May be read-ahead is
>>   used with read and is not used with mmap.

OD> how about reading manual page on madvise(2) and redoing your test?

OK. I did but no luck.  The results are quite the same.

I think the hugest problem is:

 0  2  0 210736  19472   2000 733188 216   0  5068     2  382   340   4   2  94
 0  2  0 210424  20108   1860 729596 219   0  4732     0  319   352   4   1  96
 0  2  0 210216  19652   1616 727280 254   0  4718    10  313   298   3   4  93
 1  1  0 209756  19988   1744 723940 285   0  4523    14  313   197   6   6  88
 0  2  0 209700  20096   1904 722236 223   0  4485    15  307   265   7   5  88

 So then file is memory mapped and is read from some pages are coming
 out from swap instead of being read from file....
 

OD> Also cache is best cleaned by unmounting filesystem in question
OD> and then mounting it back.

Well. This was not really needed as I repeated the test several times
in a loop without clearing the cache after initial cleaning to see how
stable are results.




-- 
Best regards,
 Peter                            mailto:pz@spylog.ru


      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-03-14  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-13 13:17 Peter Zaitsev
2002-03-13 13:41 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-03-13 13:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-13 14:48   ` Re[2]: " Peter Zaitsev
2002-03-13 14:58     ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-13 15:17       ` Re[3]: " Peter Zaitsev
2002-03-14  9:27 ` Peter Zaitsev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1781804867952.20020314122715@spylog.ru \
    --to=pz@spylog.ru \
    --cc=green@namesys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®