From: "Adrián Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Adrián Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Liviu Dudau" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/panthor: Add vm_bind region with kbo range overlap check
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:14:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178231404195.4098752.7306517513763497783.b4-reply@b4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3e1136d-8854-47a6-9ada-d94e70a5f751@arm.com>
On 2026-06-24 15:49:32+01:00, Steven Price wrote:
> On 19/06/2026 13:41, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
>
> > When a VM is created, caller has to specify the range of the address space
> > carve-out set aside for mapping kernel BO's. That means vm_bind mappings of
> > UM-exposed BO's should not intersect with that region, but at the moment
> > we're not checking this.
> >
> > At first, I thought of giving these values to drm_gpuvm_init() through its
> > reserve_{offset, range} arguments, but it turns out that is meant for VM
> > address spans that are not managed through the usual drm_gpuvm split/merge
> > circuit, so storing the end of the user VA range at VM creation time and
> > doing a quick check in the vm_bind ioctl path was the simplest workaround.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
> > index 31cc57029c12..a8de4fe6b231 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
> > @@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ struct panthor_vm {
> > u64 end;
> > } kernel_auto_va;
> >
> > + /** @user_va_end: Last VA in the address range VM users can map objects against. */
> > + u64 user_va_end;
> > +
> > /** @as: Address space related fields. */
> > struct {
> > /**
> > @@ -2893,6 +2896,8 @@ panthor_vm_create(struct panthor_device *ptdev, bool for_mcu,
> > va_range = full_va_range;
> > }
> >
> > + vm->user_va_end = kernel_va_start - 1;
> > +
> > mutex_init(&vm->mm_lock);
> > drm_mm_init(&vm->mm, kernel_va_start, kernel_va_size);
> > vm->kernel_auto_va.start = auto_kernel_va_start;
> > @@ -2981,6 +2986,10 @@ panthor_vm_bind_prepare_op_ctx(struct drm_file *file,
> > if (!IS_ALIGNED(op->va | op->size | op->bo_offset, vm_pgsz))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + /* We don't allow mappings that overlap with kbo's reserved range */
> > + if (op->va + op->size > vm->user_va_end)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Minor issue, but this is off-by-one. If you attempt to map just the last
> page then op->va==kernel_va_start - PAGE_SIZE and op->size == PAGE_SIZE.
> But this check will reject it.
>
> I suggest removing the "- 1" from user_vm_end, which also means it
> matches the user_va_range we pass back to user space (will appropriate
> comment/name updates).
On top of that, we need an overflow check on (op->va + op->size) for sparse
mappings. At the moment panthor_vm_prepare_map_op_ctx() does bound checks
for normal bindings, but since sparse mappings aren't bounded other than the
user/lernel VA space split, we'll need a fix for that to. I'll add another
Fixes: tag and reference the relevant sparse binding support commit.
> Thanks,
> Steve
Cheers,
Adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 12:41 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add vm_bind param check to ensure no overlap with kbo AS carveout Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/panthor: Add vm_bind region with kbo range overlap check Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-19 12:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-19 12:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-19 16:47 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-24 14:49 ` Steven Price
2026-06-24 15:14 ` Adrián Larumbe [this message]
2026-06-24 17:35 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panthor: Fix comment to reflect actual struct field name Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-24 14:49 ` Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178231404195.4098752.7306517513763497783.b4-reply@b4 \
--to=adrian.larumbe@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®