From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7807B3FAE1A; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783424259; cv=none; b=VV4cnmSxNnCq8lp5l0WRZjob9N7n8/uuh6DuoJjJDlgjweRBi0LdUy/98xU0Rr+hO711ec34e7i3kcp3kl7pqHs4wppqMWNbyknM8j6uz62DEXdpmJ47J9Us184BQb85AT1uSuklNVgJwU1JEvaGCkY9F9vDTI9OExV9vdIaOlc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783424259; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nxLRtyZV5uhR3MmF+Bv4Z3jCboLy297tLwn8sDjV8DM=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r1qZUwRGrNnNHGBSh/XvYrEVhmb/t4LlTbWToq+BHKmRcZcCWsTsN/gQv4Jipa1o9S3/92Loy3tqGPyLp9RhuxZVV0bL5AaUXRZaRRwAWlbH6v84z2FYOFgTZWJ6dO9dir052eGbzv4lwUNGoXfLhGLbZnUAYzII21O8Lwaj20o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jszjGOCf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jszjGOCf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D6051F000E9; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:37:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783424258; bh=KLtN4T2yWQxsPrJ1fLRXF87VMXmi3H2CE+pR75C8H88=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=jszjGOCfbfq7pZo2UnXVLEXkDa2OKlGuvEqfyhOMmHjHxkHmMPjI51Hjhbnpy0c03 8VKnkkc1gL/0q82mpzQ4fP5i5L+QPtfS/ICvGQVKyF9N7BhdASj8ZSUW7iRiKIZkSP eYMJVy/95CWGNl8F674aYhRNW+0uzym9PVdFros0apLGxaj8UfFhbxyLpcd0ltUUJX huKD/TtMn84aV63YtBji/jFCHRg62IdOfJ3XOGMIxacRL3/N38HK4atdczSMclVl3j urUyldKw7ZFve5qqH2L2sub/Nc/pmgURX6UQgERrV8nAp7/zO0uWwpJlumNtnW6017 Z7anxOwk66M1w== From: Carlos Maiolino To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexjlzheng@gmail.com Cc: Jinliang Zheng In-Reply-To: <20260702115611.3605810-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com> References: <20260702115611.3605810-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_csn_t for xlog_cil_push_now() push_seq parameter Message-Id: <178342425683.389943.1273930158078103552.b4-ty@b4> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:37:36 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15.2 On Thu, 02 Jul 2026 19:56:11 +0800, alexjlzheng@gmail.com wrote: > The push_seq argument to xlog_cil_push_now() carries a CIL checkpoint > sequence number, not a log sequence number (LSN). > > Change the parameter type from xfs_lsn_t to xfs_csn_t to correctly > reflect its semantics and match the surrounding types. Both types are > int64_t under the hood, so this is a type-annotation fix with no > behavioural change. > > [...] Applied to for-next, thanks! [1/1] xfs: use xfs_csn_t for xlog_cil_push_now() push_seq parameter commit: de7400fc098b6aa4acbae9c3f5167c91e8ced908 Best regards, -- Carlos Maiolino