From: "tip-bot2 for Usama Arif" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] hrtimer: Don't take cpu_base::lock in hrtimer_get_next_event() when hres_active
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:32:39 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178345995993.744054.3760104924144576805.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707153800.542394-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: c4415c993fc2c8bdf2cf0bfbcbb1ac0e0f7a9eaf
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c4415c993fc2c8bdf2cf0bfbcbb1ac0e0f7a9eaf
Author: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
AuthorDate: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:38:00 -07:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 23:26:58 +02:00
hrtimer: Don't take cpu_base::lock in hrtimer_get_next_event() when hres_active
hrtimer_get_next_event() runs on every tick-stop decision via
get_next_timer_interrupt() -> cmp_next_hrtimer_event(). When high
resolution timers are active it must return KTIME_MAX -- the caller
documents and depends on this.
The function takes cpu_base->lock, checks hres_active, and returns
KTIME_MAX.
Taking the lock is not required because cpu_base->hres_active is only
written by the local CPU in hrtimer_switch_to_hres() from hard interrupt
context and in hrtimers_cpu_starting() during bring-up.
All callers of hrtimer_get_next_event() reach it from the tick-stop /
cpuidle paths with interrupts disabled on that CPU. No writer can therefore
race with the read, so an unlocked hres_active check is stable and the lock
can be skipped in this case.
On a 176-thread AMD EPYC 9D64 running a production workload, bucketing
callers of native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(), the slowpath had 199 samples
in total, of which 54 are attributed to hrtimer_get_next_event(), i.e. this
accounts for ~27% of slowpath hits on this specific workload.
Move the hres_active check before the lock guard region to address this.
[ tglx: Massaged change log and comments ]
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260707153800.542394-1-usama.arif@linux.dev
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 9c320ab..697816d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -1786,13 +1786,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__hrtimer_get_remaining);
ktime_t hrtimer_get_next_event(void)
{
struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
- ktime_t expires = KTIME_MAX;
- guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&cpu_base->lock);
- if (!hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
- expires = __hrtimer_get_next_event(cpu_base, HRTIMER_ACTIVE_ALL);
+ /*
+ * When HRES is active cmp_next_hrtimer_event() expects KTIME_MAX.
+ *
+ * cpu_base->hres_active is written only by the local CPU in
+ * hrtimer_switch_to_hres() from hard interrupt context and in
+ * hrtimers_cpu_starting() during CPU bring-up, and all callers reach
+ * this with interrupts disabled on the same CPU, so an unlocked read is
+ * stable without holding the lock.
+ */
+ if (hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
+ return KTIME_MAX;
- return expires;
+ guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&cpu_base->lock);
+ return __hrtimer_get_next_event(cpu_base, HRTIMER_ACTIVE_ALL);
}
/**
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 15:38 [PATCH] hrtimers: skip cpu_base->lock " Usama Arif
2026-07-07 21:32 ` tip-bot2 for Usama Arif [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178345995993.744054.3760104924144576805.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®