From: "tip-bot2 for Sandipan Das" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/amd/brs: Fix kernel address leakage
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:24:50 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178376549047.1844600.703834809296930525.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3Cf05931c4f89a146c364bd5dc6b8170b1ac611c65=2E1783701?= =?utf-8?q?239=2Egit=2Esandipan=2Edas=40amd=2Ecom=3E?=
The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 47915e855fb38b42133e31ba917d99565f862154
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/47915e855fb38b42133e31ba917d99565f862154
Author: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:04:49 +05:30
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:19:28 +02:00
perf/x86/amd/brs: Fix kernel address leakage
A user-only branch stack can contain branches that originate from
the kernel. As a result, kernel addresses are exposed to user space
even when PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER is requested. On AMD processors
supporting X86_FEATURE_BRS (Zen 3 only), perf can still report entries
such as SYSRET/interrupt returns for which the branch-from addresses
are in the kernel.
E.g.
$ perf record -j any,u -c 4000 -e branch-brs -o - -- \
perf bench syscall basic --loop 1000 | \
perf script -i - -F brstack|tr ' ' '\n'| \
grep -E '0x[89a-f][0-9a-f]{15}'
...
0xffffffff810001c4/0x72e2e32955eb/-/-/-/0//-
0xffffffff810001c4/0x72e2d94a9821/-/-/-/0//-
0xffffffff810001c4/0x72e2d94ffa1b/-/-/-/0//-
...
BRS provides no hardware branch filtering, so privilege level
filtering is performed entirely in software. However, amd_brs_match_plm()
only validates the branch-to address against the requested privilege
levels. For branches from the kernel to user space, the branch-from
address is left unchecked and is leaked. Extend the software filter to
also validate the branch-from address, so that any branch record whose
branch-from address is in the kernel is dropped when
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER is requested.
Fixes: 8910075d61a3 ("perf/x86/amd: Enable branch sampling priv level filtering")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f05931c4f89a146c364bd5dc6b8170b1ac611c65.1783701239.git.sandipan.das@amd.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710110235.F3FD81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
---
arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c
index 06f35a6..dc56468 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c
@@ -259,13 +259,13 @@ void amd_brs_disable_all(void)
amd_brs_disable();
}
-static bool amd_brs_match_plm(struct perf_event *event, u64 to)
+static bool amd_brs_match_plm(struct perf_event *event, u64 from, u64 to)
{
int type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
int plm_k = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL | PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV;
int plm_u = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
- if (!(type & plm_k) && kernel_ip(to))
+ if (!(type & plm_k) && (kernel_ip(to) || kernel_ip(from)))
return 0;
if (!(type & plm_u) && !kernel_ip(to))
@@ -338,11 +338,11 @@ void amd_brs_drain(void)
*/
to = (u64)(((s64)to << shift) >> shift);
- if (!amd_brs_match_plm(event, to))
- continue;
-
rdmsrq(brs_from(brs_idx), from);
+ if (!amd_brs_match_plm(event, from, to))
+ continue;
+
perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br+nr);
br[nr].from = from;
reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178376549047.1844600.703834809296930525.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®