From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com,
vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com, vikas.gupta@broadcom.com,
rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com, dharmender.garg@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] bnge: Drop obsolete bn->bnapi NULL checks in open/close paths
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:18:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178851712888.4131868.14842103781611157090@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901191728.643212-5-bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
- [High] NULL pointer dereference on a retried interface open after a
failed open: bn->grp_info is now allocated once during probe…
--
bnge: Drop obsolete bn->bnapi NULL checks in open/close paths
This removes the "if (!bn->bnapi)" guards from bnge_free_ring_stats(),
bnge_clear_bnapi_queues(), bnge_disable_int() and bnge_hwrm_ring_free(),
on the grounds that bn->bnapi now lives from bnge_netdev_alloc() until
bnge_netdev_free().
One question below about the sibling allocation, bn->grp_info, which was
moved to probe lifetime by the same series but is still freed by the open
error path.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_netdev.c
> index dcf04d391570b..dc3d51f31e5ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_netdev.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,6 @@ static void bnge_free_ring_stats(struct bnge_net *bn)
> struct bnge_dev *bd = bn->bd;
> int i;
>
> - if (!bn->bnapi)
> - return;
> -
> for (i = 0; i < bd->nq_nr_rings; i++) {
> struct bnge_napi *bnapi = bn->bnapi[i];
> struct bnge_nq_ring_info *nqr = &bnapi->nq_ring;
[Severity: High]
The reasoning here applies equally to bn->grp_info, which the same series
moved to probe lifetime via bnge_init_ring_grps(bn, true) in
bnge_netdev_alloc(), with the matching free in bnge_netdev_free(). But the
open path still frees it on error. Can a retried open dereference a NULL
bn->grp_info?
bnge_init_nic():
bnge_init_ring_grps(bn, false);
bnge_init_vnics(bn);
rc = bnge_init_chip(bn);
if (rc)
goto err_free_ring_grps;
return rc;
err_free_ring_grps:
bnge_free_ring_grps(bn);
bnge_free_rx_ring_pair_bufs(bn);
return rc;
and bnge_free_ring_grps() drops the probe-time allocation entirely:
static void bnge_free_ring_grps(struct bnge_net *bn)
{
kfree(bn->grp_info);
bn->grp_info = NULL;
}
bnge_init_chip() can fail on any of its firmware calls
(bnge_hwrm_stat_ctx_alloc(), bnge_hwrm_ring_alloc(),
bnge_hwrm_vnic_alloc(), bnge_hwrm_set_vnic_filter(), ...), for example on a
busy or timing-out firmware. bnge_open_core() then unwinds through
err_free_irq -> bnge_free_irq() -> bnge_del_napi() -> bnge_free_core() ->
bnge_hwrm_if_change(bd, false) and returns, with the netdev still
registered and bn->grp_info left NULL.
Is there anything that reallocates it before the next open? The only
allocation site is bnge_init_ring_grps() under irq_re_init, and the open
path calls it with irq_re_init == false, so the loop writes through the
NULL pointer:
if (irq_re_init) {
bn->grp_info = kzalloc_objs(struct bnge_ring_grp_info,
bd->nq_nr_rings);
if (!bn->grp_info)
return -ENOMEM;
}
for (i = 0; i < bd->nq_nr_rings; i++) {
bn->grp_info[i].fw_grp_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
bd->nq_nr_rings is at least 1, so a second "ip link set <dev> up" after a
failed open looks like it oopses on bn->grp_info[0].fw_grp_id.
Should the err_free_ring_grps label in bnge_init_nic() simply stop freeing
grp_info now that its lifetime is probe to remove?
This also appears to still be the case at the end of the series (commit
c51d67eb0c2d), where bnge_free_nq0() dereferences bn->grp_info[0] during
teardown and would add a second crash path after such a failed open.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260901191728.643212-1-bhargava.marreddy%40broadcom.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 19:17 [PATCH net-next 0/7] bnge: Support async events while down Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] bnge: Extract bnapi allocation and cleanup into helpers Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] bnge: Extract per-NQ ring allocation and init helpers Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] bnge: Move bnapi and ring_grp allocation to probe/remove Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-04 10:18 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] bnge: Drop obsolete bn->bnapi NULL checks in open/close paths Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-04 10:18 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] bnge: Quiesce NQ0 around ring teardown in bnge_free_core() Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-04 10:18 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] bnge: Create NQ0 during probe and keep active across open/close Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-04 10:18 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] bnge: Process async events while administratively down Bhargava Marreddy
2026-09-04 10:18 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178851712888.4131868.14842103781611157090@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dharmender.garg@broadcom.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com \
--cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®