From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Seungwon Bae <qotmddnjs@ajou.ac.kr>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
idosch@nvidia.com, shuah@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] vxlan: reject dynamic fdb entries that reference a nexthop id
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:30:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178856460565.1016359.3887268447112947358.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902155956.296699-1-qotmddnjs@ajou.ac.kr>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 00:59:56 +0900 you wrote:
> The commit cited in the Fixes tag allowed VXLAN FDB entries to point to
> FDB nexthops so that overlay traffic could be load balanced across
> multiple VTEPs. Such entries can only be configured from user space,
> cannot be learned and cannot roam. They only make sense with a user space
> control plane such as E-VPN where data plane learning is disabled.
>
> Despite that, the VXLAN driver does not currently prevent such entries
> from being configured with the "dynamic" flag. The per-nexthop FDB list
> is only protected by the per-device hash lock, which is not sufficient
> when two VXLAN devices point to the same FDB nexthop and therefore share
> the list. Aging runs in softirq context without RTNL, so an entry deleted
> by one device can race with an addition or deletion from the other,
> leading to list corruption:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v3] vxlan: reject dynamic fdb entries that reference a nexthop id
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/98fc57d16744
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 15:59 Seungwon Bae
2026-09-02 19:04 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-09-04 23:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178856460565.1016359.3887268447112947358.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qotmddnjs@ajou.ac.kr \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®