mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: doebel@amazon.de
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] loopback: orphan zerocopy frags before releasing the sender in loopback_xmit()
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:51:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178903390340.219967.14631556073294686161@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909085542.3370986-1-doebel@amazon.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1

- [High] Incomplete fix: the bug class the commit claims to close
  (AF_PACKET PACKET_TX_RING zerocopy frags being released to userspace…
- [Low] No in-tree test pins down the newly fixed behaviour.

--

loopback: orphan zerocopy frags before releasing the sender in loopback_xmit()

This adds a skb_orphan_frags_rx() call at the top of loopback_xmit() so that
AF_PACKET PACKET_TX_RING zerocopy frags are copied into kernel memory before
the bare skb_orphan() runs tpacket_destruct_skb() and returns the ring slot to
userspace.  On allocation failure the skb is dropped and the tx_dropped
counter is bumped.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/loopback.c b/drivers/net/loopback.c
> index 1fb6ce6843ad..31ae10a9d791 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/loopback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/loopback.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,23 @@ static netdev_tx_t loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  {
>  	int len;
>  
> +	/* The skb_orphan() below will run the skb's destructor, which
> +	 * for AF_PACKET TX-ring senders marks the slot as TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE
> +	 * again, even though it still has zerocopy frags pointing to it that
> +	 * will only be copied later in the receive path's
> +	 * skb_orphan_frags_rx(). As such, if the receive path gets deferred,
> +	 * for example by RPS steering the packet to another CPU, this creates
> +	 * a race where userspace may fill in new data into the frag before the
> +	 * old data gets copied out.
> +	 *
> +	 * Take a kernel-private copy.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags_rx(skb, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
> +		dev_core_stats_tx_dropped_inc(dev);
> +		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_SKB_UCOPY_FAULT);
> +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +	}
> +

[Severity: High]
Is loopback_xmit() the only local reinjection site with this pattern?
vrf_local_xmit() in drivers/net/vrf.c looks like the same sequence, and its
comment even says it reinserts "similar to loopback handling":

drivers/net/vrf.c:vrf_local_xmit() {
	unsigned int len = skb->len;

	skb_orphan(skb);

	skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
	...
	if (likely(__netif_rx(skb) == NET_RX_SUCCESS))
		dev_dstats_rx_add(dev, len);
	...
}

There is no skb_orphan_frags_rx() before that skb_orphan(), and the path is
reachable from an AF_PACKET TX-ring send on a VRF device:

  tpacket_fill_skb()      /* skb_zcopy_set_nouarg(skb, ph.raw) */
    -> dev_queue_xmit()
      -> vrf_xmit()
        -> is_ip_tx_frame()
          -> vrf_process_v4_outbound()   /* rt->dst.dev == vrf_dev */
            -> vrf_local_xmit()

vrf_process_v4_outbound() only pulls ETH_HLEN + sizeof(struct iphdr), so the
payload stays in the user pages, and __netif_rx() can again defer the read to
another CPU through RPS/backlog after skb_orphan() has already marked the slot
TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE.

Would it make sense to mirror this hunk in vrf_local_xmit(), or to do the copy
once in the common receive-injection path (netif_rx_internal() /
enqueue_to_backlog()) so that all local reinjection sites are covered?

>  	skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
>  
>  	/* do not fool net_timestamp_check() with various clock bases */

Regarding the reproducer in the changelog:

>       ip netns add ns && ip -netns ns link set lo up
>       ip netns exec ns sh -c \
>           'echo 100 > /sys/class/net/lo/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus'
>       taskset -c 0 ip netns exec ns ./txring_overwrite

[Severity: Low]
Could the rps_cpus and taskset setup be added to the in-tree harness as well?

tools/testing/selftests/net/txring_overwrite.c binds the TX ring to "lo" in
setup_tx() and main() sends the two frames through the reused slot, but
nothing configures rx deferral:

tools/testing/selftests/net/run_afpackettests:
	./in_netns.sh ./txring_overwrite

tools/testing/selftests/net/in_netns.sh:setup() {
	ip netns add "${NETNS}"
	ip -netns "${NETNS}" link set lo up
}

Without the rps_cpus mask and the CPU pinning, __netif_rx() consumes the frags
in line on the sending CPU, so txring_overwrite passes both with and without
the new skb_orphan_frags_rx() call in loopback_xmit().  As it stands, removing
that call again would not make any in-tree test fail.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260909085542.3370986-1-doebel%40amazon.de

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  8:55 Bjoern Doebel
2026-09-09 15:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-10  9:51 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178903390340.219967.14631556073294686161@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=doebel@amazon.de \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®