From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: doebel@amazon.de
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] loopback: orphan zerocopy frags before releasing the sender in loopback_xmit()
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:51:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178903390340.219967.14631556073294686161@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909085542.3370986-1-doebel@amazon.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1
- [High] Incomplete fix: the bug class the commit claims to close
(AF_PACKET PACKET_TX_RING zerocopy frags being released to userspace…
- [Low] No in-tree test pins down the newly fixed behaviour.
--
loopback: orphan zerocopy frags before releasing the sender in loopback_xmit()
This adds a skb_orphan_frags_rx() call at the top of loopback_xmit() so that
AF_PACKET PACKET_TX_RING zerocopy frags are copied into kernel memory before
the bare skb_orphan() runs tpacket_destruct_skb() and returns the ring slot to
userspace. On allocation failure the skb is dropped and the tx_dropped
counter is bumped.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/loopback.c b/drivers/net/loopback.c
> index 1fb6ce6843ad..31ae10a9d791 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/loopback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/loopback.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,23 @@ static netdev_tx_t loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> {
> int len;
>
> + /* The skb_orphan() below will run the skb's destructor, which
> + * for AF_PACKET TX-ring senders marks the slot as TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE
> + * again, even though it still has zerocopy frags pointing to it that
> + * will only be copied later in the receive path's
> + * skb_orphan_frags_rx(). As such, if the receive path gets deferred,
> + * for example by RPS steering the packet to another CPU, this creates
> + * a race where userspace may fill in new data into the frag before the
> + * old data gets copied out.
> + *
> + * Take a kernel-private copy.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags_rx(skb, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
> + dev_core_stats_tx_dropped_inc(dev);
> + kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_SKB_UCOPY_FAULT);
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
Is loopback_xmit() the only local reinjection site with this pattern?
vrf_local_xmit() in drivers/net/vrf.c looks like the same sequence, and its
comment even says it reinserts "similar to loopback handling":
drivers/net/vrf.c:vrf_local_xmit() {
unsigned int len = skb->len;
skb_orphan(skb);
skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
...
if (likely(__netif_rx(skb) == NET_RX_SUCCESS))
dev_dstats_rx_add(dev, len);
...
}
There is no skb_orphan_frags_rx() before that skb_orphan(), and the path is
reachable from an AF_PACKET TX-ring send on a VRF device:
tpacket_fill_skb() /* skb_zcopy_set_nouarg(skb, ph.raw) */
-> dev_queue_xmit()
-> vrf_xmit()
-> is_ip_tx_frame()
-> vrf_process_v4_outbound() /* rt->dst.dev == vrf_dev */
-> vrf_local_xmit()
vrf_process_v4_outbound() only pulls ETH_HLEN + sizeof(struct iphdr), so the
payload stays in the user pages, and __netif_rx() can again defer the read to
another CPU through RPS/backlog after skb_orphan() has already marked the slot
TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE.
Would it make sense to mirror this hunk in vrf_local_xmit(), or to do the copy
once in the common receive-injection path (netif_rx_internal() /
enqueue_to_backlog()) so that all local reinjection sites are covered?
> skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
>
> /* do not fool net_timestamp_check() with various clock bases */
Regarding the reproducer in the changelog:
> ip netns add ns && ip -netns ns link set lo up
> ip netns exec ns sh -c \
> 'echo 100 > /sys/class/net/lo/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus'
> taskset -c 0 ip netns exec ns ./txring_overwrite
[Severity: Low]
Could the rps_cpus and taskset setup be added to the in-tree harness as well?
tools/testing/selftests/net/txring_overwrite.c binds the TX ring to "lo" in
setup_tx() and main() sends the two frames through the reused slot, but
nothing configures rx deferral:
tools/testing/selftests/net/run_afpackettests:
./in_netns.sh ./txring_overwrite
tools/testing/selftests/net/in_netns.sh:setup() {
ip netns add "${NETNS}"
ip -netns "${NETNS}" link set lo up
}
Without the rps_cpus mask and the CPU pinning, __netif_rx() consumes the frags
in line on the sending CPU, so txring_overwrite passes both with and without
the new skb_orphan_frags_rx() call in loopback_xmit(). As it stands, removing
that call again would not make any in-tree test fail.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260909085542.3370986-1-doebel%40amazon.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 8:55 Bjoern Doebel
2026-09-09 15:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-10 9:51 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178903390340.219967.14631556073294686161@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=doebel@amazon.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®