From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: quanyeyang@proton.me
Cc: edumazet@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, matttbe@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org,
martineau@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix data-race in tcp_recv_should_stop
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:00:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178909561770.219967.14152174482046052505@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-mptcp-sk-err-net-v1-1-da71aaec9afd@proton.me>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
- [High] Incomplete data-race fix: only the sk_err load inside
tcp_recv_should_stop() is annotated, while every caller of the helper…
--
tcp: fix data-race in tcp_recv_should_stop
This converts the sk_err load in the tcp_recv_should_stop() helper to
READ_ONCE(), since do_recvmmsg() calls sock_error() without the socket
lock and clears sk_err with xchg(). A KCSAN report on an MPTCP socket
is quoted in the changelog.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/14749060-d011-41e7-9a4b-754eb5bd9d5b@redhat.com/
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 436495ff2271d..c61d8678eafd3 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -3082,7 +3082,8 @@ enum skb_drop_reason tcp_inbound_hash(struct sock *sk,
>
> static inline int tcp_recv_should_stop(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - return sk->sk_err ||
> + /* sk_err can be cleared locklessly by sock_error(). */
> + return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_err) ||
> sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
> (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
> signal_pending(current);
[Severity: High]
Does annotating only the helper close the race the changelog describes?
Every caller of tcp_recv_should_stop() still has a plain load of the same
field in the same wait loop, a few lines below the helper call.
net/mptcp/protocol.c:mptcp_recvmsg() - the function named in the quoted
report:
if (copied) {
if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk) ||
!timeo)
break;
} else {
if (sk->sk_err) {
copied = sock_error(sk);
break;
}
net/ipv4/tcp.c:tcp_recvmsg_locked() has the identical pair:
if (copied) {
if (!timeo ||
tcp_recv_should_stop(sk))
break;
} else {
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
break;
if (sk->sk_err) {
copied = sock_error(sk);
break;
}
The same unmarked load also remains in tcp_splice_read() and in
mptcp_splice_read(), which are the other two callers of the helper.
The racing writer is unchanged in all four cases:
net/socket.c:do_recvmmsg() {
...
if (likely(!(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))) {
err = sock_error(sock->sk);
...
}
which runs with no socket lock and does xchg(&sk->sk_err, 0) in
sock_error(). So a thread in recvmsg() on the copied == 0 path and a
second thread in recvmmsg() on the same socket still produce the marked
read-write versus unmarked read pair, and the splat looks like it would
just be re-reported from mptcp_recvmsg() and tcp_recvmsg_locked()
directly instead of from the inlined helper.
Would it make sense to convert those four sibling loads to READ_ONCE()
in the same patch?
The changelog only mentions the leftover problem as:
This does not consume sk_err; the check-then-sock_error() TOCTOU
on the no-data paths is a separate issue.
That describes a semantic check-then-act concern, which is distinct from
the plain concurrent load. Could the changelog say explicitly which
sk_err loads remain unmarked after this change?
Converting the sibling reads would also make the change applicable to
trees that predate the Fixes: eb477fdd6803 helper, where only those reads
exist.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260908-mptcp-sk-err-net-v1-1-da71aaec9afd%40proton.me
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 2:59 Quanye Yang via B4 Relay
2026-09-08 17:25 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-09 2:01 ` quanyeyang
2026-09-11 3:00 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178909561770.219967.14152174482046052505@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quanyeyang@proton.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®