From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] gre: make gre_parse_header() report a drop reason
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:37:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178936064042.22033.10502810106599240452@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913034937.875068-4-littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1
- [Low] The new interface comment added above gre_parse_header()
(net/ipv4/gre_demux.c:65-68) states that a NULL @reason means "the…
--
gre: make gre_parse_header() report a drop reason
This replaces the unused csum_err output parameter of gre_parse_header()
with an enum skb_drop_reason pointer, adds SKB_DROP_REASON_GRE_INVALID_HDR
and SKB_DROP_REASON_GRE_CSUM, and converts the ip_gre, ip6_gre and
gre_demux receive paths to kfree_skb_reason().
No Link: tags were present in the commit header.
One question below about the documented meaning of a NULL reason.
> A NULL reason keeps the meaning a NULL csum_err had: the caller is not
> interested in it and the checksum must not be verified. This matters
> for the ICMP error handlers, which only get a part of the original
> packet and must not drop it when the checksum does not validate.
[Severity: Low]
Is the phrase "the checksum must not be verified" accurate here? With a
NULL reason the checksum is still computed, and on the success path the
skb checksum state is still modified; only the reporting of a failure is
skipped. Would "a checksum failure must not be reported" describe what
the code does?
The same wording is added to the kerneldoc-style comment below, see the
inline note.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/gre_demux.c b/net/ipv4/gre_demux.c
> index 96fd7dc6d82dd..efd5f60a9c591 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/gre_demux.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/gre_demux.c
> @@ -58,26 +58,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gre_del_protocol);
>
> /* Fills in tpi and returns header length to be pulled.
> * Note that caller must use pskb_may_pull() before pulling GRE header.
> + *
> + * @reason is only written when the header is rejected, so the caller has
> + * to initialise it before the call.
> + *
> + * A NULL @reason means that the caller is not interested in the drop
> + * reason, and also that the checksum must not be verified. This is what
> + * the ICMP error handlers need, as they only get a part of the original
> + * packet.
> */
> int gre_parse_header(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tnl_ptk_info *tpi,
> - bool *csum_err, __be16 proto, int nhs)
> + enum skb_drop_reason *reason, __be16 proto, int nhs)
> {
[Severity: Low]
Does the new comment match the implementation for the NULL @reason case?
gre_parse_header() is exported, so a future caller may rely on this
contract, but the GRE_CSUM block below still calls
skb_checksum_simple_validate() unconditionally and, when it succeeds,
skb_checksum_try_convert() updates ip_summed/csum_valid on the skb:
net/ipv4/gre_demux.c:gre_parse_header() {
...
if (greh->flags & GRE_CSUM) {
if (!skb_checksum_simple_validate(skb)) {
skb_checksum_try_convert(skb, IPPROTO_GRE,
null_compute_pseudo);
} else if (reason) {
...
}
Only the error return is gated on @reason. The two NULL callers,
ipgre_err() in net/ipv4/ip_gre.c and ip6gre_err() in net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:
if (gre_parse_header(skb, &tpi, NULL, htons(ETH_P_IP),
iph->ihl * 4) < 0)
return;
still have the checksum of their partial packet computed and the csum
state touched. This is the same behaviour as the pre-patch csum_err ==
NULL case, so nothing changes at runtime; would it be worth wording the
comment as "a checksum error is not reported" instead of "the checksum
must not be verified"?
> @@ -87,8 +104,8 @@ int gre_parse_header(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tnl_ptk_info *tpi,
> if (!skb_checksum_simple_validate(skb)) {
> skb_checksum_try_convert(skb, IPPROTO_GRE,
> null_compute_pseudo);
> - } else if (csum_err) {
> - *csum_err = true;
> + } else if (reason) {
> + *reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_GRE_CSUM;
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260913034937.875068-1-littlesmilingcloud%40gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 3:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] tunnels: add core and gre drop reasons Anton Danilov
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] ip_tunnel: add drop reasons to the generic RX path Anton Danilov
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] ip6_tunnel: " Anton Danilov
2026-09-14 4:37 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] gre: make gre_parse_header() report a drop reason Anton Danilov
2026-09-14 4:37 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] ip_gre: add drop reasons to the RX path Anton Danilov
2026-09-14 4:37 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] ip6_gre: " Anton Danilov
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] ip_tunnel: add drop reasons to the transmit path Anton Danilov
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] ip_gre: " Anton Danilov
2026-09-13 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] ip6_tunnel: " Anton Danilov
2026-09-14 4:37 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178936064042.22033.10502810106599240452@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®