mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v10 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:57:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178951306345.22033.3166494756326322419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914151340.3227501-11-dhowells@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0

- [Medium] rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() charges the full token cost to
  prep->quotalen at net/rxrpc/key.c:209 (`prep->quotalen += datalen +…

--

rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported

The RxGK key parser now looks up the userspace-supplied encryption type
with crypto_krb5_find_enctype() and rejects the token if the enctype is
unknown or if the supplied key length does not match the enctype.  The
RxGK-specific token handling is also made conditional on CONFIG_RXGK.

Link: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260824091645.415423-1-dhowells%40redhat.com

> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/key.c b/net/rxrpc/key.c
> index cbd26da449510..cdef609996d28 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/key.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/key.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -166,12 +167,14 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
>  				       size_t datalen,
>  				       const __be32 *xdr, unsigned int toklen)
>  {
> +	const struct krb5_enctype *enc;
>  	struct rxrpc_key_token *token, **pptoken;
>  	time64_t expiry;
>  	size_t plen;
>  	const __be32 *ticket, *key;
>  	s64 tmp;
>  	size_t raw_keylen, raw_tktlen, keylen, tktlen;
> +	int ret = -EKEYREJECTED;
>  
>  	_enter(",{%x,%x,%x,%x},%x",
>  	       ntohl(xdr[0]), ntohl(xdr[1]), ntohl(xdr[2]), ntohl(xdr[3]),

[ ... ]

> @@ -229,6 +232,17 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
>  	token->rxgk->key.data	= token->rxgk->_key;
>  	token->rxgk->ticket.len = raw_tktlen;
>  
> +	/* Check the enctype is supported. */
> +	enc = crypto_krb5_find_enctype(token->rxgk->enctype);
> +	if (!enc) {
> +		ret = -ENOPKG;
> +		goto reject_token;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
Can this new -ENOPKG path leave prep->quotalen charged for memory that
was freed?

Earlier in rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() the whole token cost is added to
the quota before any of these checks run:

	plen = sizeof(*token) + sizeof(*token->rxgk) + tktlen + keylen;
	prep->quotalen += datalen + plen;

with tktlen bounded only by AFSTOKEN_GK_TOKEN_MAX (16384).  The
reject_token label then does kfree(token->rxgk) and kfree(token) without
subtracting that amount again.

Every pre-existing reject path here returned -EKEYREJECTED, -EKEYEXPIRED
or -ENOMEM, and rxrpc_preparse_xdr() turns those into an abort:

		switch (ret2) {
		case 0:
			ret = 0;
			break;
		case -EPROTONOSUPPORT:
			break;
		case -ENOPKG:
			if (ret != 0)
				ret = -ENOPKG;
			break;
		default:
			ret = ret2;
			goto error;
		}

-ENOPKG is the soft case: if another token in the same payload (for
example an RXKAD token) parsed successfully, ret stays 0 and the key is
still instantiated, so __key_instantiate_and_link() ->
key_payload_reserve(key, prep->quotalen) commits the inflated value
against the owner's key quota:

security/keys/key.c:key_payload_reserve() {
	...
		if (delta > 0 &&
		    (key->user->qnbytes + delta > maxbytes ||
		     key->user->qnbytes + delta < key->user->qnbytes)) {
			ret = -EDQUOT;
	...
}

Since key_quota_maxbytes defaults to 20000 bytes, a single crafted
add_key("rxrpc", "afs@...", ...) payload containing one valid RXKAD token
plus an RxGK token with an unsupported enctype appears to be able to
charge roughly 16KB that is not actually held, making later add_key()
calls for that uid fail with -EDQUOT.

Would it be better to do the enctype lookup and key length check before
the prep->quotalen += datalen + plen accounting, or to subtract
datalen + plen on the -ENOPKG path?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260914151340.3227501-1-dhowells%40redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14 15:13 [PATCH net v10 00/14] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 01/14] rxrpc: Fix lack of short-send handling in rxrpc_kernel_send_data() David Howells
2026-09-14 21:11   ` David Laight
2026-09-15 13:36   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 02/14] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 03/14] rxrpc: Fix aborting in rxperf test server David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 04/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 05/14] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 06/14] rxrpc: Fix error handling in rxrpc_send_data() David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 07/14] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 08/14] rxrpc: Fix double IRQ enablement David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 09/14] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 11/14] afs: Fix creation of RxGK CM channel token to have right size David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 12/14] afs: Fix lack of setting call->server when doing FS.InlineBulkStatus David Howells
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 13/14] afs: Fix uncleared op->call pointer David Howells
2026-09-15 22:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 15:13 ` [PATCH net v10 14/14] rxrpc: fix use-after-free in rxrpc_poke_conn() David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178951306345.22033.3166494756326322419@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®