From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 967E637C930; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789560413; cv=none; b=Zh/8DgWWbQBlnyl5UoLJZ3EnKxY6Z7ivaomLj0AsNFyTH70rYnmpXw2hKDatjGCXbJnKYNiu+1AbixCWMC9NGzNzW5kyFw7tkk5a8ECiEBTYJIgqn+v4wofh/QAXsl+/JfsJsaE9fhUOepIUp6io57LnxlZvbR/lVStxi0WM0eI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789560413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=V9WmN3pS9RQt3VJdSTU3OsV+czBArpTcxUhzd5C60LA=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QW+IBftviS8OwwQJeOjfOPwfaJKBJBToCT5h+OibrUzLscum4Z3pgO1tP++LtGjz3AWp/8JQHoo8Gq201iT+5aeDlZmYi8TC3SJvA8dg8MzDuvnIAoxLcwyayInpsZhXPPAmhV+RqzH4Dy8d7S2c4CIk3Ze/g2FYKMJ65RgzUKM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AgdnOPoX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AgdnOPoX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A1C61F0089A; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:06:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789560405; bh=3BVXiVmYcM6ZXh0uAhydcd0lKmWtt4lNRNnh97r56I4=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=AgdnOPoXxVubyQ8Uc4YeQcA9bm/Y741cELaSbSEqVbtSciP0vZlAHOUPXPWwS+wKm 02Qm/vz4zTb2ugjjGZPyZt2qC83uuzScWEFod/jn5Le3TCN3Ry05TCOR0tvyUi6afe GEyXYZYBCIZlVXXdqVbrxcK5jMO/9UR+WAGm7dxIIX9tQ5g9ZgXLkedZVf5kudSDsU JUZDSILEOhUqH5x+LIDWmQ6PXLdBmHV1w8+UaCLAKDD2sJx6Rnp0MIGhBaft//ru1x q2EAmY5Ns8u1cI+pP+t57zj/lPTW6TbHcBXM1K6zJ6PYinEMJwVJpYnGVTiu9YxKSl 3hNOUB7VXN/rA== From: Carlos Maiolino To: Jiangshan Yi Cc: djwong@kernel.org, ljp1205831794@gmail.com, gaoyingjie@uniontech.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 13667453960@163.com In-Reply-To: <20260914082111.195006-1-yijiangshan@kylinos.cn> References: <20260914082111.195006-1-yijiangshan@kylinos.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove duplicate INO1_WRITTEN check Message-Id: <178956040379.10466.12341783504062469919.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:06:43 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:21:11 +0800, Jiangshan Yi wrote: > Commit a23eca88448e ("xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing > issue with INO1_WRITTEN") duplicated commit b2d5a81dae38 ("xfs: fix > exchange-range reflink flag clearing issue with INO1_WRITTEN"), so > xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() ended up with two identical > XFS_EXCHMAPS_INO1_WRITTEN checks. The second one is dead code, > since the first one already returned false. Remove it. > > [...] Applied to for-next, thanks! [1/1] xfs: remove duplicate INO1_WRITTEN check commit: ce2b91bebc7bc0495fe3ad5ee47e4977fbb77fc5 Best regards, -- Carlos Maiolino