From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, zefir.kurtisi@westermo.com,
claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, wei.fang@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, horms@kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com,
yangbo.lu@nxp.com, ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 7/7] net: enetc: drain and cancel one-step TX tstamp queue when going down
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 23:36:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178960176110.22033.17058557096563845963@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915222735.1016937-8-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 (1) · Medium: 4 · Low: 0
- [Medium] The drain/cancel/flag-reset is added to enetc_stop(), which is
not only the "going down" path but also the generic "pause traffic"…
- [Medium] The new cancel_work_sync() + skb_queue_purge(&priv->tx_skbs) +
clear_bit_unlock(ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS) sequence in…
- [Medium] The patch's justification footnote accepts that
enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp() can call enetc_start_xmit() after…
- [Medium] The new unconditional
clear_bit_unlock(ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS) in enetc_stop()…
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp() (enetc.c:2996-2998) dequeues an skb
from priv->tx_skbs and calls enetc_start_xmit() while discarding the…
--
net: enetc: drain and cancel one-step TX tstamp queue when going down
The patch cancels the priv->tx_onestep_tstamp work item, purges the
priv->tx_skbs queue and resets ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS in
enetc_stop(), after napi_disable(), so that no deferred one-step PTP Sync
packet survives ifdown or driver unbind.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 62cdcaab3f3fb..892490ff1ebee 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -3110,6 +3110,10 @@ void enetc_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
> napi_disable(&priv->int_vector[i]->napi);
> }
>
> + cancel_work_sync(&priv->tx_onestep_tstamp);
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message says the late frame submitted by the work item "will be
put in the disabled TX BD ring, where nothing will happen with it until
enetc_free_rxtx_rings() later reclaims its memory". Does that cover the
hardware producer index as well?
enetc_map_tx_buffs() ends in enetc_update_tx_ring_tail():
/* includes wmb() */
enetc_wr_reg_hot(tx_ring->tpir, tx_ring->next_to_use);
so a submission that lands after enetc_disable_tx_bdrs() advances
ENETC_TBPIR and tx_ring->next_to_use. Neither enetc_stop(),
enetc_free_tx_ring() nor enetc_assign_tx_resource() rolls those back, and
enetc_setup_txbdr() adopts the register values instead of clearing them on
ENETC v1:
/* For ENETC v1, clearing PI/CI registers for Tx not supported,
* adjust sw indexes
*/
tx_ring->next_to_use = enetc_txbdr_rd(hw, idx, ENETC_TBPIR);
tx_ring->next_to_clean = enetc_txbdr_rd(hw, idx, ENETC_TBCIR) &
ENETC_TBCIR_IDX_MASK;
if (tx_ring->next_to_use != tx_ring->next_to_clean &&
!is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
After enetc_reconfigure() (enetc_stop(); enetc_free_rxtx_rings(); new
resources; enetc_setup_bdrs(); enetc_start();) an ENETC v1 part would come
back up with TBPIR != TBCIR on a freshly allocated, zero-filled BD ring, and
the driver's next_to_clean would point at a scrubbed swbd whose skb and DMA
mapping were already released by enetc_free_tx_frame(). Should the stop or
teardown path reconcile TBPIR with next_to_use, or keep the one-step frame
out of the disabled ring in the first place?
> + skb_queue_purge(&priv->tx_skbs);
[Severity: Medium]
enetc_stop() is also the generic "pause traffic" helper, not only the going
down path. It has three callers: enetc_close(), enetc_reconfigure() and
enetc_set_coalesce(). In the last two the interface stays administratively
up, so is the unconditional purge here dropping one-step Sync packets for
which the driver already returned NETDEV_TX_OK in enetc_start_xmit()?
if (enetc_cb->flag & ENETC_F_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC_TSTAMP) {
if (test_and_set_bit_lock(ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS,
&priv->flags)) {
skb_queue_tail(&priv->tx_skbs, skb);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
}
That would make ethtool -C, XDP program attach/detach and hwtstamp
reconfiguration silently discard accepted PTP Sync frames.
Related to the same call sites, the footnote's reclaim argument does not seem
to hold for enetc_set_coalesce(), which is just:
if (netif_running(ndev) && changed) {
/* reconfigure the operation mode of h/w interrupts,
* traffic needs to be paused in the process
*/
enetc_stop(ndev);
enetc_start(ndev);
}
There is no enetc_free_rxtx_rings() in between, so a descriptor left in the
ring by the flushed work item is not reclaimed but transmitted once the ring
is re-enabled. Should the drain live in enetc_close() instead, or be
conditional on the interface actually going down?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but it limits what the new purge
can reclaim. enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp() discards the return value of
enetc_start_xmit():
skb = skb_dequeue(&priv->tx_skbs);
if (skb)
enetc_start_xmit(skb, priv->ndev);
enetc_start_xmit() has NETDEV_TX_BUSY exits (the LSO and TSO paths, plus the
linear one):
if (enetc_bd_unused(tx_ring) < ENETC_TXBDS_NEEDED(count)) {
netif_stop_subqueue(ndev, tx_ring->index);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
which neither transmit nor free the skb, because only a qdisc caller can
requeue it. Does the work item leak that skb, given the dequeued reference
is the only one left?
The one-step branch has already run test_and_set_bit_lock() before those
returns, so does ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS also stay set with no
packet in flight? The work item is only rescheduled from
enetc_clean_tx_ring() on a one-step TX completion, and that schedule_work()
happens inside the cleanup loop while tx_ring->next_to_clean is published
only after the loop, so the worker can observe a stale, nearly-full ring:
enetc_poll() -> enetc_clean_tx_ring()
schedule_work(&priv->tx_onestep_tstamp); /* inside the loop */
...
tx_ring->next_to_clean = i; /* after the loop */
Such an abandoned skb is neither on priv->tx_skbs for the new
skb_queue_purge() nor in a TX ring for enetc_free_rxtx_rings(), so it would
survive ifdown and unbind too.
> + clear_bit_unlock(ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS, &priv->flags);
[Severity: Medium]
The peer consumer touches exactly this state under the TX lock:
enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp()
netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
clear_bit_unlock(ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS, &priv->flags);
skb = skb_dequeue(&priv->tx_skbs);
Should the new drain and flag reset take netif_tx_lock_bh() as well?
netif_tx_stop_all_queues() only sets QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF, it is not
netif_tx_disable() and takes no per-queue TX lock, so an ndo_start_xmit that
already passed the netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped() check inside
HARD_TX_LOCK can still be running enetc_start_xmit() concurrently, and
enetc_start_xmit() has no ENETC_TX_DOWN test.
For the ndo_stop path this looks harmless, since __dev_close_many() calls
dev_deactivate_many(head, true) and waits for some_qdisc_is_busy() before
ndo_stop. But enetc_set_coalesce() and enetc_reconfigure() call enetc_stop()
on a live interface with no qdisc deactivation, so:
CPU A CPU B
enetc_start_xmit() enetc_stop()
-> skb_queue_purge(&priv->tx_skbs)
-> clear_bit_unlock(IN_PROGRESS)
-> test_and_set_bit_lock(IN_PROGRESS)
-> skb_queue_tail(&priv->tx_skbs, skb)
In the enetc_reconfigure() case the racing frame is released by
enetc_free_rxtx_rings() -> enetc_free_tx_frame(), which produces no TX
completion, so nothing calls schedule_work(&priv->tx_onestep_tstamp) again.
enetc_start() clears only ENETC_TX_DOWN and enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp_init() is
just INIT_WORK plus skb_queue_head_init:
INIT_WORK(&priv->tx_onestep_tstamp, enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp);
skb_queue_head_init(&priv->tx_skbs);
so can the IN_PROGRESS bit stay set for the rest of the up cycle, with every
subsequent one-step Sync appended to priv->tx_skbs and never sent?
[Severity: Medium]
This clear also releases the gate that enforces the MAC's "one single-step
frame in flight" rule, and the commit message accepts that cancel_work_sync()
may join the work item only after it pushed its frame into the disabled ring.
enetc_set_coalesce() then re-enables the same ring without reinitializing it,
via enetc_start() -> enetc_enable_txbdr():
tbmr = enetc_txbdr_rd(hw, idx, ENETC_TBMR);
tbmr |= ENETC_TBMR_EN;
enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBMR, tbmr);
so the stale one-step descriptor is fetched and transmitted at a point where
the gate is already clear. A new one-step Sync accepted right after
enetc_start() reprograms the single global single-step register:
val |= ENETC_SET_SINGLE_STEP_OFFSET(offset);
if (udp)
val |= ENETC_PM0_SINGLE_STEP_CH;
enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC_PM0_SINGLE_STEP, val);
Can the correction field offset and the UDP checksum selector then be applied
to the wrong frame? And when the stale frame finally completes, its
schedule_work() makes enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp() clear a gate that now belongs
to the newer frame, so does the one-in-flight invariant stay broken for
subsequent frames as well?
> +
> enetc_clear_interrupts(priv);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_stop);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260915222735.1016937-1-vladimir.oltean%40nxp.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 22:27 [PATCH v3 net 0/7] Fix short frame transmission in enetc vladimir.oltean
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 1/7] net: enetc: consistenly track dropped frames in enetc_xdp_xmit() vladimir.oltean
2026-09-16 2:16 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-16 23:35 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 2/7] net: enetc: ensure enetc_xdp_xmit() calls enetc_update_tx_ring_tail() vladimir.oltean
2026-09-16 2:20 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-16 23:35 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 3/7] net: enetc: fix bogus TX ring consumer index after reinitialization vladimir.oltean
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 4/7] net: enetc: pad short frames in software vladimir.oltean
2026-09-16 23:35 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-17 10:11 ` David Laight
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 5/7] net: enetc: pad short XDP frames coming from devmap vladimir.oltean
2026-09-16 23:35 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 6/7] net: enetc: linearize PTP event packets with one-step TX timestamping vladimir.oltean
2026-09-16 1:59 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-16 9:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-09-16 23:35 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 net 7/7] net: enetc: drain and cancel one-step TX tstamp queue when going down vladimir.oltean
2026-09-16 23:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178960176110.22033.17058557096563845963@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
--cc=zefir.kurtisi@westermo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®