From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: mhal@rbox.co
Cc: stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
jasowangio@gmail.com, eperezma@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, asias@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 4/5] vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 23:39:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178960195730.22033.16636722417726715635@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v2-4-a1d9abb472f7@rbox.co>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0 (1)
- [Medium] Undocumented change of connect()'s return value / sk_err
consumption for an already-established socket.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Low] Reported gap (validated as resolved later in this series,
therefore discarded): at this commit vsock_connect() keys its "do not…
--
vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket
This teaches the vsock_connect() wait loop about the TCP_ESTABLISHED ->
TCP_CLOSING transition triggered by VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST, so a socket that
is still linked in vsock_connected_table is not reset behind the receive
path's back. It also rewrites the tail of vsock_connect() and drops a
stale comment.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/anzT1fREOSyHT99k@v4bel/
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index 499e902becfad..adf3f018347ea 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1834,23 +1833,22 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> - /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
> - * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
> + /* Connection was established. Whatever happens to socket once
> + * we release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
> * into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
> *
> * Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
> * here is racy and insecure.
> */
> - if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
> - break;
> + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ||
> + sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSING) {
> + err = 0;
> + goto out_wait;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
The old code did a plain break here, so control fell through to the
err = sock_error(sk) tail. Now it jumps straight to out_wait with err = 0.
Combined with the tail change below, does this mean a blocking connect()
that wakes up in TCP_ESTABLISHED with sk_err already set now returns 0
instead of that error, leaving sk_err queued for the next send()/recv()?
That window looks reachable via virtio_transport_recv_connected(), which
runs only for TCP_ESTABLISHED sockets:
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:virtio_transport_recv_connected() {
case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW:
if (!virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(vsk, skb)) {
...
(void)virtio_transport_reset(vsk, skb);
virtio_transport_do_close(vsk, true);
sk->sk_err = ENOBUFS;
...
}
and virtio_transport_do_close() only downgrades the state when the receive
queue is empty:
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:virtio_transport_do_close() {
WRITE_ONCE(vsk->peer_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK);
if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0)
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSING;
...
}
In the queue-full case vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) > 0, so sk_state stays
TCP_ESTABLISHED while sk_err == ENOBUFS.
The changelog mentions only the TCP_CLOSING transition plus "Drop the
redundant err=0 and the inaccurate comment above signal_pending()". Could
the changelog also spell out that connect() no longer reports or consumes a
pending sk_err for an established socket? The patch carries a Fixes:
d021c344051a tag, so it is a backport candidate and the user-visible change
of the connect() return value seems worth documenting.
>
> /* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
> * to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
> * to retry.
> - *
> - * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
> - * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
> - * assigned.
> */
> if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
> err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : sock_intr_errno(timeout);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1874,8 +1872,8 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> }
>
> - err = sock_error(sk);
> - if (err) {
> + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED && sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSING) {
> + err = sock_error(sk);
> sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
> sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> }
[Severity: Low]
This is a pre-existing issue and not introduced by this patch, but the new
whitelist covers only TCP_ESTABLISHED and TCP_CLOSING. A socket that is
still linked in vsock_connected_table but was moved to TCP_CLOSE by a
lockless event handler still gets reset to SS_UNCONNECTED both here and in
the signal_pending() branch above.
Two writers do that without calling vsock_remove_connected():
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:virtio_vsock_reset_sock() {
vsk->peer_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
sk_error_report(sk);
}
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c:vmci_transport_handle_detach() {
WRITE_ONCE(vsk->peer_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK);
...
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
}
With sock->state == SS_UNCONNECTED, a retry connect() takes the default:
branch, vsock_assign_transport() returns early because the transport is
unchanged, transport->connect() is re-issued, and the next RESPONSE reaches
__vsock_insert_connected():
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:__vsock_insert_connected() {
sock_hold(&vsk->sk);
list_add(&vsk->connected_table, list);
}
which is the same list_add double add BUG quoted in the changelog, plus a
leaked struct sock reference.
For the record, this appears to be closed by the next patch in the series,
"vsock: Handle sudden TCP_CLOSE during connect", which adds
/* Virtio/PM events are serviced locklessly. */
if (READ_ONCE(vsk->peer_shutdown)) {
err = -ECONNRESET;
goto out;
}
to the same default: branch, and every writer above sets
peer_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK before moving the socket to TCP_CLOSE, so no
action seems needed on the series as a whole. Would it be worth noting in
this patch's changelog that the TCP_CLOSE variant of the same race is
handled by the following patch?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260915-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v2-0-a1d9abb472f7%40rbox.co
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 13:15 [PATCH net v2 0/5] vsock: Fix connect() races Michal Luczaj
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 1/5] vhost/vsock: Fix socket state constant Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:28 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: Streamline socket reset on transport/PM event Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:30 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-16 23:39 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 3/5] vsock: Enforce no-transport invariant for TCP_LISTEN sockets Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:30 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-16 23:39 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 4/5] vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:30 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-16 23:39 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 5/5] vsock: Handle sudden TCP_CLOSE during connect Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:31 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-16 23:39 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178960195730.22033.16636722417726715635@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®