From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: lgs201920130244@gmail.com
Cc: nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mediatek: fix PPE resource leak on remove
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 08:19:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178963314597.22033.1751942424673544030@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916051618.2904439-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 2 (1) · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
- [High] mtk_remove() now calls mtk_ppe_deinit(eth)
(drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:5409) *before*…
- [High] The patch closes only half of the leak it claims to fix.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] mtk_ppe_init() registers per-PPE debugfs entries via
mtk_ppe_debugfs_init() (mtk_ppe.c:934), which creates a top-level…
--
net: mediatek: fix PPE resource leak on remove
This adds a mtk_ppe_deinit(eth) call to mtk_remove() so that the l2_flows
rhashtables allocated by mtk_ppe_init() are released on device removal, the
way the probe error unwind already does. A few questions about the placement
and the completeness of the teardown below.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index fd7a49ae88d01..903dac36ccf10 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -5406,6 +5406,7 @@ static void mtk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> netif_napi_del(ð->tx_napi);
> netif_napi_del(ð->rx_napi);
> + mtk_ppe_deinit(eth);
[Severity: High]
Can this destroy ppe[i]->l2_flows while the netdevs are still registered and
their flow offload callbacks are still live?
mtk_ppe_deinit() only calls rhashtable_destroy(), which frees the bucket
table and leaves ht->tbl dangling, while eth->ppe[i] stays non-NULL:
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe.c:mtk_ppe_deinit() {
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(eth->ppe); i++) {
if (!eth->ppe[i])
return;
rhashtable_destroy(ð->ppe[i]->l2_flows);
}
}
The unregister_netdev() calls only happen afterwards, in mtk_cleanup() ->
mtk_unreg_dev(), and unregistering a device with offloaded flower rules
replays the removals back into the driver:
unregister_netdev() -> dev_shutdown() -> tcf_block_offload_unbind() ->
tcf_block_unbind() -> tcf_block_playback_offloads(..., add=false) ->
fl_reoffload()
net/sched/cls_flower.c:fl_reoffload() {
cls_flower.command = add ?
FLOW_CLS_REPLACE : FLOW_CLS_DESTROY;
For an MTK_FLOW_TYPE_L2 (bridge) entry that lands back in the already
destroyed table:
mtk_eth_setup_tc_block_cb() -> mtk_flow_offload_cmd() ->
mtk_flow_offload_destroy() -> mtk_foe_entry_clear() ->
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe.c:__mtk_foe_entry_clear() {
if (entry->type == MTK_FLOW_TYPE_L2) {
rhashtable_remove_fast(&ppe->l2_flows, &entry->l2_node,
mtk_flow_l2_ht_params);
Is there anything preventing a concurrent FLOW_CLS_REPLACE from reaching
mtk_foe_entry_commit_l2() -> rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast() on the same
freed table? mtk_remove() holds neither rtnl nor mtk_flow_offload_mutex.
The same applies to eth->reset.monitor_work and eth->pending_work, which are
only cancelled later, inside mtk_cleanup():
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:mtk_cleanup() {
mtk_sgmii_destroy(eth);
mtk_unreg_dev(eth);
mtk_free_dev(eth);
cancel_work_sync(ð->pending_work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(ð->reset.monitor_work);
If those re-run mtk_open()/napi_enable(), the receive path reaches
mtk_ppe_check_skb() -> rhashtable_lookup_fast(&ppe->l2_flows) on the freed
table.
The probe unwind orders this the other way around:
err_unreg_netdev:
mtk_unreg_dev(eth);
err_deinit_ppe:
mtk_ppe_deinit(eth);
Would placing mtk_ppe_deinit(eth) after mtk_cleanup(eth) match that order?
[Severity: High]
Does this leave eth->flow_table leaked?
mtk_probe() initializes two rhashtables per PPE index: l2_flows inside
mtk_ppe_init(), and eth->flow_table inside mtk_eth_offload_init():
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c:mtk_eth_offload_init() {
if (!eth->ppe[id] || !eth->ppe[id]->foe_table)
return 0;
return rhashtable_init(ð->flow_table, &mtk_flow_ht_params);
}
The only two rhashtable_destroy() call sites in
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/ are both on ppe->l2_flows, in mtk_ppe_init()'s
error path and in mtk_ppe_deinit(), so eth->flow_table's bucket table is
never freed on unbind either before or after this patch. Should
mtk_ppe_deinit() (or the remove path) also destroy eth->flow_table?
Two related observations on eth->flow_table:
Only rhashtable_free_and_destroy() does cancel_work_sync(&ht->run_work), so a
pending deferred rehash work item stays pointing into struct mtk_eth, which
is devm_kzalloc'ed in mtk_probe() and freed on detach.
eth->flow_table is a single per-device field, but mtk_eth_offload_init() is
called once per PPE index in the mtk_probe() loop, and ppe_num is 2 on
mt7986/mt7981 and 3 on mt7988. Does re-running rhashtable_init() on the same
object overwrite and leak the previously allocated bucket table already at
probe time?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since mtk_ppe_deinit() is now
the PPE teardown for the remove path: it has no counterpart for the debugfs
entries created during init.
mtk_ppe_init() ends with mtk_ppe_debugfs_init(ppe, index), and that creates a
top level directory plus two files whose private data is the devm_kzalloc'ed
struct mtk_ppe:
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_debugfs.c:mtk_ppe_debugfs_init() {
root = debugfs_create_dir(ppe->dirname, NULL);
debugfs_create_file("entries", S_IRUGO, root, ppe, &mtk_ppe_debugfs_foe_all_fops);
debugfs_create_file("bind", S_IRUGO, root, ppe, &mtk_ppe_debugfs_foe_bind_fops);
The root dentry is not stored anywhere and there is no debugfs_remove() for
the PPE in the driver (the only debugfs_remove() in
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/ is in mtk_wed.c, which does keep
hw->debugfs_dir). With CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y, does reading
/sys/kernel/debug/ppe0/entries after unbind dereference the freed struct
mtk_ppe and its freed dmam-allocated foe_table, and does a re-probe collide
with the stale ppe0 directory? Would adding the debugfs teardown to
mtk_ppe_deinit() be appropriate here?
> mtk_cleanup(eth);
> free_netdev(eth->dummy_dev);
> mtk_mdio_cleanup(eth);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260916051618.2904439-1-lgs201920130244%40gmail.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 5:16 Guangshuo Li
2026-09-16 7:01 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-17 6:55 ` Wayen Yan
2026-09-17 8:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178963314597.22033.1751942424673544030@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®