mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: mail@birger-koblitz.de
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	neuromoments@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 08/15] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A PHYs
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 21:24:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178968029951.22033.7295791968219633553@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916-ax88179a-v12-8-60c04c9924a2@birger-koblitz.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 2

- [Low] The patch exposes .get_eee/.set_eee (ax88179a_devices.c:209-221,
  table entries at :232-233) and activates the LPI path by populating…
- [Low] The commit message contains a non-existent part number:
  "Configure phylink to work with the PHYs in the AX88197A controllers"…

--

ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A PHYs

This adds .get_eee/.set_eee to ax88179a_ethtool_ops, both forwarding to
phylink, and copies supported_interfaces into
phylink_config.lpi_interfaces in ax88179a_phylink_setup() so phylink
considers the MAC LPI capable.

>     ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A PHYs
>
>     Configure phylink to work with the PHYs in the AX88197A controllers
>     and provide ethtool get/set eee operations calling into phylink.

[Severity: Low]
Should "AX88197A" read "AX88179A" here?  The driver only knows
AX_VERSION_AX88179A, AX88772D and AX88279, so the part number in the
changelog does not match anything in the tree.

Also, would it help to spell out which variants are affected?
ax88179a_phylink_setup() and ax88179a_ethtool_ops are shared by all three
chips, and dev->net->ethtool_ops = &ax88179a_ethtool_ops is assigned in
ax88179a_bind() without a chip check, so AX88279 gains user-configurable
EEE too, while AX88772D stays unsupported because lpi_capabilities is left
at 0 for it:

	if (!data->is_ax88772d) {
		data->phylink_config.lpi_capabilities = MAC_100FD | MAC_1000FD;
		data->phylink_config.eee_enabled_default = false;
	}

and phylink_ethtool_get_eee()/phylink_ethtool_set_eee() then return
-EOPNOTSUPP for that variant.

Finally, the message says only "configure phylink to work with the PHYs",
which does not mention the actual mechanism being added, namely declaring
the MAC's LPI-capable interfaces so phylink_create() sets
mac_supports_eee.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c
> index 785919e14e861..6bf1ac17aa1d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,20 @@ static int ax88179a_get_eeprom_len(struct net_device *net)
>  		return AX88179A_EEPROM_LEN;
>  }
>  
> +static int ax88179a_get_eee(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_keee *edata)
> +{
> +	struct ax88179_data *ax179_data = netdev2data(net);
> +
> +	return phylink_ethtool_get_eee(ax179_data->phylink, edata);
> +}
> +
> +static int ax88179a_set_eee(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_keee *edata)
> +{
> +	struct ax88179_data *ax179_data = netdev2data(net);
> +
> +	return phylink_ethtool_set_eee(ax179_data->phylink, edata);
> +}
> +

[ ... ]

> @@ -440,6 +456,10 @@ static int ax88179a_phylink_setup(struct usbnet *dev)
>  		phy_if_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII;
>  	}
>  
> +	memcpy(data->phylink_config.lpi_interfaces,
> +	       data->phylink_config.supported_interfaces,
> +	       sizeof(data->phylink_config.lpi_interfaces));
> +

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but what does userspace see for the Tx LPI timer now?

ax88179a_phylink_setup() never assigns phylink_config.lpi_timer_default,
so phylink_create() leaves pl->eee_cfg.tx_lpi_timer at 0, and
ax88179a_get_eee() -> phylink_ethtool_get_eee() reports 0 us via
ethtool --show-eee.

In the other direction, ethtool --set-eee <dev> tx-lpi-timer N goes
through ax88179a_set_eee() -> phylink_ethtool_set_eee() -> eee_to_eeecfg()
which stores the value, but the MAC callback drops it:

	static int ax88179a_mac_enable_tx_lpi(struct phylink_config *config, u32 timer, bool tx_clk_stop)
	{
		struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(to_net_dev(config->dev));

		/* AX88179A does not provide LPI timer registers */
		return ax88179_write_cmd(dev, AX_GPHY_CTL, AX_GPHY_EEE_CTRL, true, 0, NULL);
	}

so the value is accepted and echoed back by get_eee without ever reaching
hardware.

For the record, this same combination already exists upstream:
ksz_phylink_get_caps() copies supported_interfaces into lpi_interfaces
without setting lpi_timer_default, and
ksz_phylink_mac_enable_tx_lpi() documents "@timer: timer value before
entering LPI (unused)" and just returns 0.  Would setting
lpi_timer_default to whatever fixed timeout the PHY uses still be worth
doing here, so --show-eee reports something meaningful?

>  	phylink = phylink_create(&data->phylink_config, dev->net->dev.fwnode,
>  				 phy_if_mode, &ax88179a_phylink_mac_ops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(phylink))

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260916-ax88179a-v12-0-60c04c9924a2%40birger-koblitz.de

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16  3:23 [PATCH net-next v12 00/15] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 01/15] phylink: Add phylink_mac_interrupt Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 02/15] phylib: Add support for PHYs with broken forced mode Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 03/15] ax88179_178a: Fix endianness of pause watermark register Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 04/15] ax88179_178a: Split driver into library and device specific code Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 05/15] ax88179_178a: Add netdev2data() convenience function Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 06/15] ax88179_178a: Add HW support for AX179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 07/15] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A MACs Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 08/15] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A PHYs Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 09/15] ax88179_178a: Add VLAN offload support for AX88179A Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 10/15] ax88179_178a: Add AX179A/AX279 multicast configuration Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 11/15] ax88179_178a: Add Suspend/resume support for AX88179A/772D/279 Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 12/15] ax88179_178a: Add ethtool get_drvinfo Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 13/15] ax88179_178a: Update driver name and information Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 14/15] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A/772D/279 EEPROM access Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16  3:24 ` [PATCH net-next v12 15/15] ax88796b: Add support for AX88772D, AX88179A and AX88279 Birger Koblitz
2026-09-17 21:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178968029951.22033.7295791968219633553@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mail@birger-koblitz.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neuromoments@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®