From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, alexis.lothore@bootlin.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
kernel@esmil.dk, minda.chen@starfivetech.com,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com, ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com,
Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, nb@tipi-net.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, PKneuper@dspace.de,
david.laight.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 5/7] net: stmmac: dwmac4: Use the correct bufzise when the len is exactly 8K
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 01:26:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178978119761.22033.12290469821672441760@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917215339.2022523-6-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 2
- [Low] Taken in isolation, the only functional hunk of this patch
(drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c:477-484,…
- [Low] Commit-message / diff mismatch in "net: stmmac: dwmac4: Use the
correct bufzise when the len is exactly 8K": the changelog states…
--
net: stmmac: dwmac4: Use the correct bufzise when the len is exactly 8K
This changes the dwmac4 set_16kib_bfsize() comparison from >= BUF_SIZE_8KiB
to > BUF_SIZE_8KiB so that a frame length of exactly 8KiB does not select the
next larger DMA buffer size, and renames the callback parameter in
dwmac4_descs.c, ring_mode.c and the stmmac_mode_ops prototype.
No Link: tags in the commit header.
> net: stmmac: dwmac4: Use the correct bufzise when the len is exactly 8K
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the subject has a typo: "bufzise" should be "bufsize".
> Lets fix the comparison and while at it, rename the parameter from len
> to mtu.
Does the changelog describe the rename in the right direction? The diff
renames mtu to len, not len to mtu:
-static int set_16kib_bfsize(int mtu)
+static int set_16kib_bfsize(int len)
Same for the ops prototype in hwif.h and for ring_mode.c. Should this read
"rename the parameter from mtu to len"?
Also, at this commit the caller still passes an MTU, not a frame length.
stmmac_setup_dma_desc() documents "@mtu: MTU to setup the dma queue and buf
with", is called with dev->mtu from stmmac_open() and with new_mtu from
stmmac_change_mtu(), keeps the comment "Returns 0 or BUF_SIZE_16KiB if mtu >
8KiB and dwmac4 or ring mode", and the sibling helper is still
stmmac_set_bfsize(int mtu). Nothing on that path adds ETH_HLEN, VLAN or FCS
yet. That unit mismatch is resolved by the following patch in the series
("net: stmmac: size the RX buffers from the frame length, not the MTU"),
which computes len = mtu + ETH_HLEN + 2 * VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN and renames
stmmac_set_bfsize()'s parameter too, but the inverted rename sentence in this
changelog would still be worth correcting on respin.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> index 2994df41ec2c4..c6a8f8d735015 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> @@ -474,11 +474,11 @@ static void dwmac4_set_sarc(struct dma_desc *p, u32 sarc_type)
> sarc_type));
> }
>
> -static int set_16kib_bfsize(int mtu)
> +static int set_16kib_bfsize(int len)
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (unlikely(mtu >= BUF_SIZE_8KiB))
> + if (unlikely(len > BUF_SIZE_8KiB))
> ret = BUF_SIZE_16KiB;
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: Low]
Taken on its own, does this hunk change the DMA buffer size the driver ends
up programming?
The only caller is stmmac_setup_dma_desc(), which falls back when the
callback returns anything below BUF_SIZE_16KiB:
/* Returns 0 or BUF_SIZE_16KiB if mtu > 8KiB and dwmac4 or ring mode */
bfsize = stmmac_set_16kib_bfsize(priv, mtu);
if (bfsize < 0)
bfsize = 0;
if (bfsize < BUF_SIZE_16KiB)
bfsize = stmmac_set_bfsize(mtu);
dma_conf->dma_buf_sz = bfsize;
For the single input whose result changes here (exactly BUF_SIZE_8KiB) the
callback now returns 0, so the fallback runs, and stmmac_set_bfsize() at this
commit still uses the inclusive comparison:
static int stmmac_set_bfsize(int mtu)
{
int ret;
if (mtu >= BUF_SIZE_8KiB)
ret = BUF_SIZE_16KiB;
so dma_buf_sz comes out as BUF_SIZE_16KiB both before and after this patch.
The boundary case is only actually fixed by the next patch in the series
("net: stmmac: size the RX buffers from the frame length, not the MTU"),
which switches stmmac_set_bfsize() to a strict > comparison and feeds both
helpers len = mtu + ETH_HLEN + 2 * VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN.
Given that, is the standalone Fixes: c3efed5ad1b0 tag on this commit right?
Backported alone to stable it would have no effect. Would it make sense to
either squash the two changes or note the dependency?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h
> index 9314bcb85c221..857f7562c6c6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ struct stmmac_mode_ops {
> bool (*is_jumbo_frm)(unsigned int len, bool enh_desc);
> int (*jumbo_frm)(struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q, struct sk_buff *skb,
> int csum);
> - int (*set_16kib_bfsize)(int mtu);
> + int (*set_16kib_bfsize)(int len);
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260917215339.2022523-1-maxime.chevallier%40bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 21:53 [PATCH net v4 0/7] net: stmmac: More selftest-related fixes Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 1/7] net: stmmac: selftests: Support running selftests on DSA conduits Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 2/7] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-19 1:26 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 3/7] net: stmmac: selftests: Check the dev->features for S-TAG offload testing Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-19 1:26 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 4/7] net: stmmac: selftests: Capture all packets for vlan checks Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-19 1:26 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 5/7] net: stmmac: dwmac4: Use the correct bufzise when the len is exactly 8K Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-18 12:25 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-18 12:45 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-18 13:47 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-19 1:26 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 6/7] net: stmmac: size the RX buffers from the frame length, not the MTU Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-17 21:53 ` [PATCH net v4 7/7] net: stmmac: selftests: Account for alignment shift on dwmac1000 for Jumbo test Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-19 1:26 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178978119761.22033.12290469821672441760@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=PKneuper@dspace.de \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=minda.chen@starfivetech.com \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®