mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
To: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: prevent local partition activation over remote partition and sibling xcpus conflict
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:14:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178992808796.3122215.5327280843811501376@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa90bb73-c2af-4d13-8f2a-0435aa528058@linux.dev>

On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 04:57:39PM +0800, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
> I think this patch is still missing a Fixes: tag for the
> cpus_excl_conflict() change.
>
> The validate_partition() change can be covered by 6da580ec656a.
>
> However, the sibling CPU ownership issue fixed in cpus_excl_conflict()
> was introduced by the following commit:
> Fixes: 2a3602030d80 ("cgroup/cpuset: Don't invalidate sibling partitions on cpuset.cpus conflict")

Thanks for pointing this out, Guopeng!

In v3, I have split the validate_partition() change (with
Fixes: 6da580ec656a) and the cpus_excl_conflict() change (with
Fixes: 2a3602030d80) into separate patches ([PATCH v3 2/3] and
[PATCH v3 3/3]) so that each patch fixes a single logical issue with its
corresponding Fixes: tag.

Best regards,
Hui

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-20 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 22:17 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: prevent overlapping local and remote partition creation Hui Peng
2026-09-20  1:22 ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-20  3:04   ` Hui Peng
2026-09-20  8:23   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cgroup/cpuset: return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict Hui Peng
2026-09-20  8:23     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: prevent local partition activation over remote partition and sibling xcpus conflict Hui Peng
2026-09-20  8:57       ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-20 18:14         ` Hui Peng [this message]
2026-09-20 18:14         ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cgroup/cpuset: return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() Hui Peng
2026-09-20 18:14           ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cgroup/cpuset: prevent activating local partition over remote one Hui Peng
2026-09-20 18:14           ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: check sibling effective_xcpus in cpus_excl_conflict() Hui Peng
2026-09-20  6:30 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: prevent overlapping local and remote partition creation Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-20  8:23   ` Hui Peng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178992808796.3122215.5327280843811501376@gmail.com \
    --to=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®