From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: james.hilliard1@gmail.com
Cc: richard.genoud@bootlin.com, maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, wens@kernel.org,
jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, samuel@sholland.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
joabreu@synopsys.com, alastair@d-silva.org, mripard@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
andre.przywara@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] dt-bindings: net: allwinner: add H616 EMAC1
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:47:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179012447733.2160803.4302270702074784510@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921-submit-h616-emac1-v1-v5-2-ada661ed9e9b@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.
Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:
- [Low] Concern (validated as a FALSE POSITIVE in the series context):
the patch documents `allwinner,sun50i-h616-emac1` in…
--
dt-bindings: net: allwinner: add H616 EMAC1
Adds the allwinner,sun50i-h616-emac1 compatible to the sun8i-a83t-emac
binding and to snps,dwmac.yaml, with no older fallback compatible, and
constrains phy-mode to rmii for that compatible. It is also added to the
snps,dwmac.yaml list that excludes snps,tso.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.yaml
> index 323a669fa9823..2cae0133b3cd4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
> - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-gmac
> - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-emac
> - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-emac
> + - const: allwinner,sun50i-h616-emac1
> - items:
> - enum:
> - allwinner,sun20i-d1-emac
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, just a note for the record after checking it.
At this commit allwinner,sun50i-h616-emac1 has no match in the tree:
git grep h616-emac1 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/
(no matches)
so a device tree node using only this compatible, with no older
fallback, validates but does not probe here.
The next and final patch in the series, "net: stmmac: sun8i: add support
for Allwinner H616 EMAC1", adds it to sun8i_dwmac_match[]:
{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-emac1",
.data = &emac_variant_h616_emac1 },
and emac_variant_h616_emac1 uses sun8i_syscon_reg_field_emac1 with only
.support_rmii = true, which matches both the "separate system-control
clock register" statement in the changelog and the phy-mode: const: rmii
constraint added here.
Since bindings are expected to land before the driver, and the
intermediate state only leaves the compatible unmatched, there is
nothing to change.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260921-submit-h616-emac1-v1-v5-0-ada661ed9e9b%40gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 0:45 [PATCH net-next v5 0/3] net: stmmac: add Allwinner H616 EMAC1 support James Hilliard
2026-09-22 0:45 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net: stmmac: sun8i: reset the MAC after PHY initialization James Hilliard
2026-09-22 7:02 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-23 0:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 0:45 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] dt-bindings: net: allwinner: add H616 EMAC1 James Hilliard
2026-09-23 0:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-22 0:45 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: stmmac: sun8i: add support for Allwinner " James Hilliard
2026-09-23 0:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179012447733.2160803.4302270702074784510@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=alastair@d-silva.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®