From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org
To: nshettyj@marvell.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] octeontx2-af: Fix BPID leak in nix_bp_enable()
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:59:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179057876428.31693.4036993774330437044@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928065718.3378580-1-nshettyj@marvell.com>
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
analysis tool scan.
- Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
(e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
- What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 6:57 nshettyj
2026-09-28 6:59 ` netdev-bot+sinfo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179057876428.31693.4036993774330437044@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nshettyj@marvell.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=rkudurumalla@marvell.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®