From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110AF4BE456; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790603148; cv=none; b=M5k4xvfcyDzpgZxiZgInkSGrEhIFFC3rGve2LoNRPuKbq3/VRhlkBGT2EQ52f7hG08N0Z6LU6pPXDmLvwDjjFNKqIldWHSQmicwmF3eN3DLAQqrbVx4gYQctDbV1FKKXJ39Os+ULQoLqKmp2iNvwfHome9eEnn+1SziyZ+qf4Ww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790603148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DxOA3K04TdGKgV9RBzwq7NMB042SfZvdvrNpiga7nYU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=OpNV/1J1uS539ijc1RH4cRUZ9oGHGRsno8u75nrqFrd3sx6efFjbzo7hcg83gBzU6IdjuK5ScEb1m/EHKKlBD1yItf/E3jBg1dNfRjTSPfr9QqSTVb5MONjsqwpDvkZy0QK63+8dqDf63S/PhB9OWo6M2bqzTIKP/38JGzhSn8A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cKQN+XVw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cKQN+XVw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0DFC1F000FF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:45:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790603146; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cKQN+XVwQ7UCa7EZC6kUj6mdDWB+hQhAfBNO5Nfmfmdh66dQKbPvE/znUP6VtZlex hl/+Wkaujhw24epzUCk+BSn/zlzUKIMKHYhGJIU12qlez++CPFcyfKnkvnCrNd6Lw8 RqxcxNmsywmwUrRJDpTO5iTLSIoAMKJPLFlMsk63oAx1Vy5wMwp2t6FKchS9rS3rhK hpL9DkakzAEW05a3y5nBgPlcsPY8utsfG+T6qafh53jaDVOY5T43y3j1A4+yVcIJEt SVTojjjLeyEx4pmm6uP+DTYSc+835nRYuCH4VK/hOVbxNwb+Le6EnxJDD084uuDJo1 6rPm820UriOKQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Hongyan Xu Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: e100: cancel timeout work during removal Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:45:45 +0000 Message-ID: <179060314551.31693.4640700550731578626@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260928134121.826-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn> References: <20260928134121.826-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.