From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019054E50B5; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790608783; cv=none; b=DrU7XYd2eWtMEG8gqdEOb9YwlP30/Ou8Yt2lUeyuv9ODD2IFcc47wYWiHOGAhWgX0b5jHHLBhC62nIKfpWTZ7pThr8L1Vkm4TPbIzbvNSKmHSnxwrh1inu8Exa09RZaXeoMI1ckWD9qpsnCvFBpz38BP7+G0OacwLjLL+GlCr00= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790608783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T80pmibn7aSi6N9hDzJvCBDoLXDCN4HDH9fhrQVJ60g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=SEytenFioYuFlywoB0PF6PhdISkPvaBVwPTMkyaUgz3XOBHMy5dkwcg/aMchF6gBppY23gjn7TJIzzmVb58Pig3RECBA9K5enMxL03r2ilbwgWWicujEVLHFq5moZmM2F5Rlkt7jyi+gGZQsqGDrdzRYgA4sKSbOG5K+4vPnQrA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N6Zf0kR9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N6Zf0kR9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 925C61F00898; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:19:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790608781; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=N6Zf0kR9t/LFK2I0XcFWXeExG6TCH1OX4UGUV8iqAsPpU+DP1BO9d1E5rBvPZ2YBi WYA8U82PMJORLgWum5bNuF4e609kw79B+0QNnvXHgjqLyIUvyuWKYmjEf5WfE6cAz4 wTaskgac7ToqOpgQZaVXSc2UhX27X/xG2seB3mhsueB3cm4sd9GK5XChKbel9aX4xt 9/xpLjRqfLNBIi8xRsXHBL/Do4Mb2a6jBkJsADkZdTY8kvkQLYlcWIfG5AFXFVZQWb GFdgmBGuNqrItrF1aMaAErbZ/f4TdbwAAp6xTQA9dwQDhxVxsEE/USBs17/lZ9Tydn ZikV82YEryfJQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Alexandra Winter Cc: Aswin Karuvally , Gerd Bayer , David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Lunn , Julian Ruess , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Simon Horman , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:19:40 +0000 Message-ID: <179060878011.31693.9560616938197921438@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260928151420.383105-1-wintera@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260928151420.383105-1-wintera@linux.ibm.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.