From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A90B373BE8; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 07:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790752801; cv=none; b=IYDL1ypeEbt+2s3TQU6OHCOeLlm7BdVjR9k7ZeER/3+vjRhj3XECKcO27mkkGhNeODF7DPmB9PBis8DW7howDGkI+jhXFF3JiBmmcC6TIQHJeqtDzDg3dkt2zpcmqXO1L4+AX3XNDYQltHpMVmxuRwpoGpZsAFtZZi85b/+pfhM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790752801; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Frc+ADQTxRwKDWaoqMQMlUJQ/gCXB8qyIs31/48aD70=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=I9huYP5ignUUMKOCy8Jx6wjnOyXRP2MSWkuY+cNLa6Wvyg6YFIibSbc9fodyvXBI8u1za+qhNb8q7c94qRvlGcXDHNgzLCVvz5mokN3/V1oWyhzDTpeG779hdCG1vhONFAOb5Hw/exqnGGiu4eVogRQKITU4SqoKsqM9JKYpK5I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=H1ZeUbIf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="H1ZeUbIf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B391F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 07:19:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790752800; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=H1ZeUbIfZC5ycSUZAJzlMkNZj42855Q7MEIBZPwVCAPRX6gP3U9b+ELjNqab1/nlV nkcAdh26pSvyMw+ytLfbvScigRWMMG94yGy7x2DAHWfRHDsYesriMumsQ+yfda1ewe R+rc2h6i7o6PMOjI5MJhc2igLfJhR4O4yi081V7T05/Rp55rt/4gi3XBCCydvL5ncK vscTkSJJm7w3ckqhaLqCxSO1ggTD0Dq+KxMIa90Zm3JNzMdCrUq1996MJwLR+ToBgr kbGzoPFfw2M1wQdq58qixN19ypytkgDg0lsk5NN6tJ7/+2CGwl9ipELmjvwcOBA60g R6JW3BfhHjM3g== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Sagi Maimon Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com, michal.simek@amd.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, robert.hancock@calian.com, sean.anderson@linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net: axienet: cap the TX poll return value at the NAPI budget Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 07:19:59 +0000 Message-ID: <179075279901.31693.4789169176025211757@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260930071536.627964-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> References: <20260930071536.627964-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.