From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7970236C5A1; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790781872; cv=none; b=UDSUz/OrjGJJBOxED2PPbCDrj6A4gqTnm2kw7XPrT2OixyPTWo/E9UbxjYuiLkWbCE+AKUIsOBg4L2YTa8joPRux3mezAkyiXRp7esIwO5jIz0emlWc1g9JO5w0AoO4X0aUtZ7GS7q60yk06nYoTYaS1xknBNQiW85UuDTSPRwI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790781872; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=fIbRL1D2jAbUgrC8pgwQEEUHgLYzXBkw+IMdfMBHVnpz5dRUBj1PHr+Edkt5t2+TmoY5HxyaVBoSlZ8Lt0DXP8iuBhjVw4/dVzhira41GbH2uYAUoLz9a/+ZcTIT22e4kIr2E97fXa7pgP/TBcSE4TC2Nvi2JZYWBaZPZPoRzfU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OZRIFGSz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OZRIFGSz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0F8B1F00893; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790781862; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=OZRIFGSzrn12wiEyXLFbsi2CvL0VAby5ISOpTiwHy9OVpOnR+Zcf/BKkpFXVdUPo8 LfyhYpUCDfKzo4lhxqmDO2nrA2xWnkiViaj6VeSaHVniglJThfCyJugqabXDYjn6B0 JC4kGwOxLNR8jlhrdZOi5B2N6aET3+Gf7vHjbh6r1Z3vp699Ha6R4Y2dxk0/yxftMJ Ergmh89k6Cb6jKkr8475YnTrlD+mRHuFyTXxeIxZ0KBaaxnVuQ9IgDOtl1tKaPUGjc jHN97Q0HZ2k84uSpGdQgqYMuNapxhXKvisCwuutYVBQRpYpkWy0zi9rN+Yab+FLZ1t tqkLNoicgHQUw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Haishuang Yan Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Michal Swiatkowski , Alexander Lobakin , Marcin Szycik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] pfcp: fix two bugs in the receive path Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:24:21 +0000 Message-ID: <179078186129.31693.12859971722109795431@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260930124818.114224-1-yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> References: <20260930124818.114224-1-yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.