From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4774C10DD; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790793514; cv=none; b=UYQKiYaLVeXjOiNqu1PRAr9Dt4sdrYFsSDSjyKyRpYZhVsu4SIUTDCwW6je9f/P8mf6gEbMztqrzDlmNVagyaygEaMIizLIoSKY9ajea8v3ke4baoCmFvOy1Z5kiTd6FTgL+Fo+Xcn2U9lcZ1c85nKbD54O+pECobAHHL/cESXg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790793514; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f6EkHzolGy8GYPjeII04sc8oTncaFwHLWXs9LkHKYfM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=JDZQmDxU4E1YvvyCwD0/rRvJ0326ZI9kbiupjPZ+TKvE+Zxl52wo8x25BpzCXwoA8aA2XFO2MZS6cw30iTze64w24cgC3aKKe3BFHZk+wt7hLquwndPjylGyN1h4GmMq8+IHULEZ9FUTKNBAGdCDjNSP6UFtcil304vxvoVwJXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fGTioOBO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fGTioOBO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05F4D1F00898; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:38:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790793512; bh=LPA6Inh2wBCKqBtP/pIYKJnpKzD87TCTJsmoxrtXeEE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=fGTioOBOlXmKYHCQionP2c0+DVb8QLcK3p7ehZDfO3RmraNwMImTPF+Nzp2N5cOH8 Kiv5Rymln/IobsPBtdci95lGj9w7EpRoa05+FGYen9tiEpIs1gD/HdYvBauawFFm1O qn9/e2pRiHZZlCL6Fnapd9KIxiaceJ1N6veU6LPgoiKlu4xCWUl+FypSy9An5CYk7g x1s8A3pK75BSB419Ew6rYhjgjZWqsX9ff/leBjH3eZkIgewQu/saq1vNI5WJh+3k5T 31taXdJDW5Jj3xN7YHJM+Gl92E4RtTdNa3Ibo0ygPAcnto6UpEFTqLZctBD3XvsxaO yg+ub8FFkfNaA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o?= Lebrun Cc: Conor Dooley , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolai Buchwitz , Vladimir Kondratiev , Gregory CLEMENT , =?utf-8?q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Monin , Tawfik Bayouk , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: macb: move printk() calls out of bp->lock critical section Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:38:31 +0000 Message-ID: <179079351154.31693.11286897642165841220@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260930-macb-irq-v1-1-8994a4c8f3bb@bootlin.com> References: <20260930-macb-irq-v1-1-8994a4c8f3bb@bootlin.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.