From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990C751CF6E; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790806481; cv=none; b=E7yCQb0P1b00IqGA8rmJUfgvBvl94G4O2Sj6A19bQTU65UTSS+/FKuuQhZYAmzgwnvMDSl8LUyoUzawhVOJqqB+OeEG/A2OJSjkQ4EQHLQEE7GQ8DzlG8ELMHB3WKJ19E42kXs7LYWeuzIyIr29lmZkky92LB8O/yg+jCxb9VaA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790806481; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=XWRnt0/I8D1okoyphDHhA9MXznaoXTaF5QYELf//ZVJN2sfbMVUl46+T3YdXX7iekwU+hwOXOj68VzpzSlFxoTqIoddKtylAeEJDpxFt7PEnbdss/kSHmyxr4iFKBiKpO58muinI3lkvLTYi/zqg7qQGjlibFK62GzqbdNvLYdY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IDnULEJv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IDnULEJv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 958881F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:14:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790806480; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=IDnULEJvAU+YloY16NpUZ77FLhCu+IquBIXCra9tHtcwIWen7thyO98Sxw5uC+gr8 1bDy3DjJZ64PVpnmfX9YdsGtZZPMd60hH0BCdH+Oa2Bydgg2zSFJtIx21/epn5wYhd hUHuoK5uLyHa+wAH2g9rN5m9F7imBXSrBHNLBv7gVQ+G3QwuEREbfVKI3T7dNCmM02 EfpmrVoaYKIJhzM7YwtRv96J1JKvGi1gtIyPqVkdvhQTU2ZADuPpPR4Y/OJSr4s64L 4Wct4NmlpBTW3fqbhUpi1cIf2gcIrGQJ6M6STLmLOdEXAsCtow21T6X8zBx9iDeyRv qD+qV7gLGl3uw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=96mer?= Mete Kaya Cc: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, david@ixit.cz, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] nfc: digital: fix read of resp->data[0] before length check in sens_req Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:14:39 +0000 Message-ID: <179080647916.31693.5412797645123910488@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260930220857.721985-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> References: <20260930220857.721985-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.