From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C2104756B8; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790808887; cv=none; b=bXEbUiRt3742E9clnWxyrPkVMnm+igfz6acyQdhV5NVf8LsiegPEn8dUDLm1a/JxcMao9u/+yJhy9s7ahgbhydZMxKhIyAu0fBdo/wDjwvayGtlvOorAgB3xboglxxaj/DEOFqsyUUy+5Eg4GDRkyrdC7WmXDP4XccEh0iAH3Fk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790808887; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=jDmiLhZ8fMJ1xD40zu2Z6WD6gkRsWfx5igoe0mwR4xrUiuoPU/aQ8LmCYlXzmS8H9z5+YdNIqYcgmoc8Jkt8D9dUvsY1isUHab1/cdLo/EDh7nvloM8LhFVO3Hd1JRbVmHvBdoxiLTzIA6BmmG6YEOx7wcxvfn8BNlpmbOMrqhg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aRqyAjak; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aRqyAjak" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B2B91F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:54:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790808884; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aRqyAjakbYoiMdqHFBSaLx9IAeSoeUCZ6CWcwaOnwjqgRVW62yjo0dcDXi4iysSgI 9YexgTzZ0wj/57nluOZkPXgwQwq0N44kRbtRKHU4wrGgQApBzAj5YnksoLlVzWDtiU kMocGl4njiXwR5HzUn2TtwsB638A1awsABVsq0ir5tnaGGVkF49wfg8tf1owjjx5F0 QOXrJlV0loOJFZMAAR5UbfK+HhBhPtq3AGVCI+ukTLKf+lgxQsenDOkaqOF/JXDxC1 7oJUj7b1hNnDaZN8CNUTHa+NakNTrwD+kMuAEL4Xe5Ox9fgS2HE51FuxpdOFvOPgHj XdSJM8QhqpR1A== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=96mer?= Mete Kaya Cc: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, david@ixit.cz, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] nfc: nci: fix out-of-bounds read in nci_core_reset_rsp_packet() Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:54:43 +0000 Message-ID: <179080888379.31693.9678596349950606516@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260930224940.725976-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> References: <20260930224940.725976-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.