From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2FA4F054E; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790846020; cv=none; b=CZzSDEqateTQdZlNUrnXBE0PC9ubaafSZFwigVnn3p6EMKVUzxGc/LiJD8Lq79kPWK77FqoVNnm3IgObJDCK7XXM2YHzLjGKhkXARVhFepJ6bMR/VNgpQOMnD0fEMVRdf+4XxycKDU6n1pxMKYGaumb3P3Ogs6Z2gjg/wG2cQLs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790846020; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f6EkHzolGy8GYPjeII04sc8oTncaFwHLWXs9LkHKYfM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=XXsJut/dR2Ra5qensitivMGTpLMiplrH11ZJ9GnK8ZST31XPVT5p0ys8XkMbDtmLUXP12aJIvdrwsgYwYPWqFQeyLg4ltx8C2k+XLjNbtX66VvyJKaNc+3gFrDg2+b4Qtem4uNdPDmK5+n3+7Qo7mT5vxD7wZU6pp51PdPoCy7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CdjRM6PD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CdjRM6PD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8943F1F0089B; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:13:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790846015; bh=LPA6Inh2wBCKqBtP/pIYKJnpKzD87TCTJsmoxrtXeEE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=CdjRM6PD/3uWG28GPr5ox6IvkZvA5BOLPaxbRHBpeWHGvgNx7EWRofaNosieYhMAt /riE7kVBOGbOAYH5ekDPJOvFC3EhIQxCAoGSShsMG852xtjdd2AdGETBmjT+j14e1w tkuMfF7HEvk8CScak68OycL9DVd2qCxRyXigBzBmofksXBzFDcgK1SHHGwVnVKkiKr bs3qrqmZlOcZxSimfMj7Um+HOOXojLkDqrho+FU+1W53zmQ+N5kCViM2egVS5RtefZ lXhBLJcYgWtafHwmj3qNQ/afbKgQLd2W79bmPsVK2A+qSZz6kGEb7mdGTd/Ogws2QU E9/pLPgV16Mpg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: MD Danish Anwar Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Siddharth Vadapalli , Roger Quadros , Kees Cook , Stefan Wiehler , Arnd Bergmann , Simon Horman , Chintan Vankar , Vignesh Raghavendra , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ti: am65-cpsw-switchdev: flush dynamic FDB entries by port on delete Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:13:34 +0000 Message-ID: <179084601411.31693.15138599168021166167@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261001090820.1605711-1-danishanwar@ti.com> References: <20261001090820.1605711-1-danishanwar@ti.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.