From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D90647DD6E; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790936987; cv=none; b=aoIo1k3+08mkpW1GP3H+cOX13t1kO8AUs4iNlJ+qQIqTgcPlrYGerOmZo1pSD3211G+LZhsyE0q1Txlv4ImQ3jOWWJakHxPbhgvChYimhkik/90UEjCrQRD2OIJfE9/bTS6CNS5e++oIReucNzSDxuE9qENpcq5ADNKXILVdVjc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790936987; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T80pmibn7aSi6N9hDzJvCBDoLXDCN4HDH9fhrQVJ60g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=jZuxw3F00u4VSwWG1AWBhzF1bKUwbRAV973GbzSgQZk2ZJI3dAqU9WBu68vYcLNfZ2ve9ALcLJs2yXfLU34BBg3Drj6PG2E5XxPprEfoiftJveG8b0yggcPu/r45VtRm2alpPIvuNimtkZceq5mf/ZxN1XyjwYgAGmu6AIcywK8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Mx89kAHY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Mx89kAHY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D165C1F00893; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:29:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790936986; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Mx89kAHYOXUrkPtgi4Ej7cRU/Yd+coe/JBpFI08aJ1xFJTAXdqOfAn5oh/y4jvqEK GjlS2X2SvA5AzVukDbw6aVVdNyuZg6Qu+JQlL9FoiFFen58scOsTKEbRaBgaO17llV 8ZM8f7oiVeYdg7jIMfYSt08IC1q5zdEuKKyHUe8phau2n9t9iA5YspQarzO+p4TE91 9SWQJ1+OTmT2VPOH18+A4uEo15HpeTNZPOAMgbHx+jsc7jqo3Vk2ZpG+fx2JSI9Ffx Br1RfUncDt3AJjrHe+bmrAv+SzoaCkFOQVu1TF+cQc3XPPiapAeFkcfX5qEXiRh4RO s3Gsxq0T1QNsg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Bruno Produit Cc: Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Zeng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dominik Czarnota , Sabrina Dubroca , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] xfrm: espintcp: reserve partial message during allocation Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:29:45 +0000 Message-ID: <179093698536.1402591.16703491801413392699@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261002102447.148835-1-bruno.produit@trailofbits.com> References: <20261002102447.148835-1-bruno.produit@trailofbits.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.