From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF3534BE44B; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790963063; cv=none; b=K9vyUdLauTfN4JYG3BxwetaqTq6+nUlE1ENx+rDuxbYbHMUirSxgOiTvhiOl8ZcQGImWKodgTeGtZP3cir5GbZGZy0U/oaVlwWqrxeq+8uKrtJNoeiMRJI4rYRx6B8GOlynNJE3NFC8pNt0s92JpnlrtrA0drcZDeKDBlHJPkto= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790963063; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=m7oqhuHacjMG3P9gDvn4rL1RJ00aEokqU0S7zzcA84sDBAqWp9kqaYPcdBBWw42Jrf5NNGJk5j5HrWHL7Mhgf5Y3HiJDUtiK+QaULv9lHesAmzPQQWDcVHcmxWUV144+shE4TLk7lpSLJpS3aAAg9GQ4gjLAYUaPwRFnfXrFcEk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cuGB07QB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cuGB07QB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F176E1F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 17:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790963054; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cuGB07QB9A1vIG01th0zcckLWVtNNuNDJZ1jpy0hjtoRIVTwscqCq4Hwcfo/3wHGb L85wpxJupNw5WtzzCT1tpOkL8onx/QBd+noyALblOqNrrNOepsB8v9+FWXtGG2vBUN McTn+6wJHZDBSRXdZVLv1Elciiajw8B/V+MxQk0nWJ4jly6pQWT4IIH/tfv0Q0NV6F IYMuyluWYFhVKVbVrLnFRkCBeAUZ+Qwu8NxdB0bQy76j2tar9Fj2vkXtDvy1GX/OTv Ui29/B3mGqmsIFMigY6Hj5JI60oKdvtSvcWnxKtw4bzhx97pjmVDdRHnt7ojcy4Cyq HkfBiIt8UarVQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Chengfeng Ye Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net: pin protocol module before inet socket allocation Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 17:44:13 +0000 Message-ID: <179096305349.1402591.6316561110428507255@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261002173844.3537111-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com> References: <20261002173844.3537111-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.