From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D9A12DC357; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 20:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790974116; cv=none; b=TrAApx+mwOB05Wm1z7g7Ma3cmC6UleGmnb47OYzPWYifzFDwaGOWwY8q9cBjeKrtff/w4j2iiUmbQzzhYC5E9VttEtwUI1YU1eqkrvFPTlAqAyNZj/0HQEHx1qnTG3JqF1BWlSK5uRFh7SWA2SQg054rYhlp94cTl0wInu0Z2ew= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790974116; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DxOA3K04TdGKgV9RBzwq7NMB042SfZvdvrNpiga7nYU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=PX9MkbslvGRhhL+giqIUvBfWTWKBGXA1yHRtMHk0asm/Qq4XK5RyH9TXWDkVSlu8PR1yoQwnF7xHtoKWbvvaSERAS02ytt9IXjFU9PgUxU7BePe6Ykis0HJ/2+l0bIsalBUPAD43NDLfRZaW3Gy/puITNxiNzX89JAtgOZZ9JmA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=O7LlxC9J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="O7LlxC9J" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D937E1F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 20:48:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790974114; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=O7LlxC9J9jBUEQYTtDRqimj0KUXceMLQ8g9t20+nPzzbB2yrOGJkXcqg4YrUYdXo4 5TkfXBhOQBEi0TxKiencu1083XC6SPMGHoDTnaoZm8bLXWyBmMN1OMYz1P4NJKg4zV TvmdtZwkROLdrTNfJKM61XwPDNOdM8fDYwPPr1RjLDtXkovkDc8x+0zwp9OU28gHyx EffKKu46aGEg7EkIZw46fleM7bv7SL5aCIRU8MC7iF6MXb1c0WIDo7NeAfgHC3vZOE i35hTnmni3L98A0pIY38dpqxP+OxVtZXgUmpall0zL3619E7iOd5yro1HT7ff/YFeS pUaBnmA4GRtaw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Artem Dinaburg Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin , David Arinzon , Shahar Itzko , Simon Horman , Jakub Kicinski , Shay Agroskin , Arthur Kiyanovski , Noam Dagan , Saeed Bishara , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] net: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 20:48:33 +0000 Message-ID: <179097411333.1402591.9823193935815787447@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261002204534.26297-1-artem@trailofbits.com> References: <20261002204534.26297-1-artem@trailofbits.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.