From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A0815AADA; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 09:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791020584; cv=none; b=Cx35MzcgNnMuyK+coeFccm1Hj2GTzVciq6jktypLDbpSdNZZAxFBjmyIg+pwg+CQ/YAFXo/ja9rn2MYy5eckybJPOeXD0d+0PxpJCiFS+OtiyKScbzaXiLr67suMStNUTjJj+82smEoybFzChhWbrgD9lkcU9+QcRfT/I0pm794= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791020584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=hA+Q22nMO7BoCV1UTt+fF0xGzAcxGi8KwGYOOJEnQrg/vVLP7DkhhOYuB1J0+5m10TF9evsEmFyfheuiUyLpuSCwEl+KVyL2Xed8FUe+qquUBmMXuUHUkjD41fS8vbTPsAlvCKcDHay0A9TQjlZjS6EhcK8r4qMJFmekLUHp6aA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FdYM2XRl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FdYM2XRl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 703171F0089B; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 09:43:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791020582; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=FdYM2XRlX+MvHBx5H8B43BsooytwXXOnmTx05w4uOHc6o2qeO8GyikzAiXrTg4MpO mOuRSGeum5+0F1aybZ6cGBSJdJB5iFVDFVMILBicnBks3hji65XAOlNj7ypSWfBAO6 eFy9ZRz4vK/DqQq3D5NWu5vEGa/ziYIyg/n9/WIBnCKdA2iNtsx4h7UTZTva8aEDYP 5Is9TMaKXNYIhq0nqXIze3HTOJUR3sw4r2sGRhCfsOivCY+BM3d4jGn7zXtWe029TH NsI9s0X9V3TrDuXXnqbgki3byJevMTp0B1kWA7ohb2xRVxOAuLnKb9T5Sy4eC2NkHW UOCSWYZg6fEqQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Jiale Yao Cc: Willem de Bruijn , Jason Wang , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tun: Drain eBPF RCU callbacks on module exit Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:43:01 +0000 Message-ID: <179102058192.1402591.6469519866772089867@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261003093822.544964-1-yaojiale02@163.com> References: <20261003093822.544964-1-yaojiale02@163.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.