From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F8C5346AC2; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 20:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791058782; cv=none; b=sqOzJ/bN00Zj3mPCMWe8sj3NPmuadiXPH2kK9Zf2pBHM8mPx2MJncs3UcFnTRGeT1PqFH+IUlNDkkzKrhYlCkX10GAwU2bgv8LZSdURQLc9lRsMJuqTNhO9FtXuG5fu/LQaLlrp7xInhafs7zC5uvEpKLs9kHz1hsgx/Bs+cDJA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791058782; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=SlViaW5qF4jTb4yso3EByshyzuqJScCWK2tNSCh2KmA4ev9MlZaqfqnjVkbYkwQWbEthvaEU3aQ49MxIaDx+ZnPkeYG1wFU2DQNbd11WhewoNoey9VMAR+4zFwodU8Msut8PfhtNteXPK0uJRaWzLdxQ2uUTxUNsqhM7Eiwkn58= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PWZph68P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PWZph68P" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B47D31F0089B; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 20:19:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791058781; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=PWZph68PirMsQXPtMU5Zuk+nhWTztWdKlewvV/bvw2n/mzEgfznBR5pKIuheVfx9k Yhqi+9UFaxzqdhswnIMZcomJF1USxKs1yBGKTuATiAsjCSnvglzsW/NhV7HDKbd7zI 6EvXpbxoH8m+IHSZ56cf5umrGiJY0QQ8gwieSeI2QGmuXx4KaLccMwOSCyYVRS04F8 ky9qHTcpLiyKBxGkk+bspesPBZ4sktzs1318v+Z89WtFod58cW0XkFTFQdP+M01v+y ydAdXCeUwJa7+1toa/dyj/XIZMP9iMzTgmFTuXEXNhmTuRN5D7Y7w4f4u3QbaHmBa3 5r/MHpY8fhxIg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Andrii Pasichnyk Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] wireguard: peer: free packets left on the per-peer queues on removal Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 20:19:40 +0000 Message-ID: <179105878022.1402591.10615903497956533993@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261003201625.4572-1-apasichnik9@gmail.com> References: <20261003201625.4572-1-apasichnik9@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.