From: Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>
To: Joonhoe Kim <26rote@gmail.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
ds.heine@posteo.de, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: glymur: hard reset on the first system-domain idle entry (SS3, 0x0200c354) after a heavy load - Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Gen 11
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2026 12:18:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179110890955.4630.479435085519179001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004093509.74316-1-26rote@gmail.com>
Hi Joonhoe,
Thanks, that is useful. On Glymur (Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Gen 11) the
pattern is different:
- Plain idle has never reset here: 50,000+ cluster (0x01000054) entries
and hundreds of SS3 entries without a reset.
- The reset needs a trigger: the first SS3 entry right after a full
all-core load (a kernel build or stress), 5 out of 5.
- With SS3 removed from the system domain and the cluster state kept,
3 out of 3 runs of that trigger survived.
- Day to day I run with a cpu_dma_latency constraint of 1500 us, which
vetoes both the cluster state and SS3 at runtime, and I have not seen
a runtime reset with it in place.
Glymur has a single CPU idle state, 0x4 retention, which is also the CPU
domain state, so every cluster entry here has its CPUs in retention. I
cannot separate the two the way you did.
A correction to my original report: the min-residency override did not
hold. With no timer pending on any CPU the governor's idle estimate is
effectively unbounded, so the residency check passes, and I had a reset
with it in place. Only removing SS3 from the system domain survived.
Oleg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 9:46 Oleg Keri
2026-10-04 9:35 ` Joonhoe Kim
2026-10-04 10:18 ` Oleg Keri [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179110890955.4630.479435085519179001@gmail.com \
--to=okerixx@gmail.com \
--cc=26rote@gmail.com \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=ds.heine@posteo.de \
--cc=jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®