From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5684530146C; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 16:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791132905; cv=none; b=sQn69icaUYZEYwcPlJqNpLPqQn9Ml4GQMCiRsYJPYk6+BiMRpdjmB5nOieD+6S8yyUMW4cWHygvmieJctIbeiH+e0jTovgqgnxY33yCl+GvNselBhUu9b7TARW1+zyedvsiKMUK0Zr9wRZiRlb6x1cVZaIvSIjw1ojLUholE7Po= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791132905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T80pmibn7aSi6N9hDzJvCBDoLXDCN4HDH9fhrQVJ60g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=tSnKuvWYgz/18CPb8KQ1y+Dqq728ndLIFccmO1iEtxX7rrEAkYJwkoNuoHELapA8JE7LQwQuXeLaD6xL8XvSUP9FNN+42a8cgUQa0TKlTBb5seuEWaDkENpJtN86bQZ9DfwxoA6lc06HRWXHirTaMUcaBEXjLv80OWMGwoI6gCw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QNJ4BsFJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QNJ4BsFJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1206C1F000FF; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 16:54:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791132892; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=QNJ4BsFJsV5oWgAFzxq0CAaWUNVWQIUTaNRVjywYyxDI1D7/W73DdPSiG2dwc030L b5iliC9akvhKPmToxWDtW2SZWxxjMBrSFGRulimNaCQgUCq0SEu7tVZH8yxYgenYIb xc1w+EFy2ANqwCYP76HNjlfQVK0IhVBl8vskQGldWElQWm3gO59+CS04BuyDSsl/gY gboVNjEAPIDzj+xcM7YAo55LsaHLENg8IGC6PkQOd0bC/FhN6RfM5sRobygBV/aeKd 5oybUA062gscSwOH3Is876fTaUq7GVHhuw/0vHxdtf04VvQvX55J+cRvI+wIy6BOGM FrGPPBi/H0xIw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Weiming Shi Cc: David Ahern , Ido Schimmel , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, co+71b6509cb791e531@bugs.sh, Xiang Mei , Eric Dumazet , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tcp: reject zero CWND route metrics Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 16:54:51 +0000 Message-ID: <179113289156.1402591.11780212844994913254@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261004164944.2006741-1-bestswngs@gmail.com> References: <20261004164944.2006741-1-bestswngs@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.