From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: fmancera@suse.de
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16 net-next v3] ipv4: disable IPv4-only sysctls when CONFIG_IPV4=n
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 17:22:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179113455439.434549.2885225995379440090@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930135334.4739-12-fmancera@suse.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider.
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
(one such reply per series is enough).
- [Medium] The patch moves the net.ipv4.fib_multipath_hash_seed entry of
ipv4_net_table (net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c, lines 1644-1650) inside…
--
ipv4: disable IPv4-only sysctls when CONFIG_IPV4=n
This commit moves the IPv4-specific entries of ipv4_net_table into a new
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV4) block at the end of the table. Those sysctls are
then not registered on kernels built without IPv4. Handlers and min/max
variables used only by those entries are marked __maybe_unused.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> index 0e7fef5973db6..6096e9e4d82d8 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1656,6 +1469,196 @@ static const struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE_THOUSAND,
> .extra2 = &tcp_rto_max_max,
> },
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV4)
[ ... ]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH
[ ... ]
> + {
> + .procname = "fib_multipath_hash_seed",
> + .data = &init_net,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(u32),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed,
> + },
> +#endif
[Severity: Medium]
Is fib_multipath_hash_seed really IPv4-only? The commit message says it
hides "the sysctls that are related to IPv4 only". However, the IPv6
datapath also uses this seed.
The shared helper in include/net/ip_fib.h is built whenever
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH is set:
include/net/ip_fib.h:fib_multipath_hash_from_keys() {
...
mp_seed = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed.mp_seed);
fib_multipath_hash_construct_key(&hash_key, mp_seed);
...
}
IPv6 ECMP reaches it through rt6_multipath_hash() and its custom hash
helpers in net/ipv6/route.c:
rt6_multipath_hash()->fib_multipath_hash_from_keys()
IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH depends only on IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER, not on IPV4. Also,
ipv4_sysctl_init_net() still calls proc_fib_multipath_hash_set_seed(net, 0)
for every netns.
Take a kernel with CONFIG_IPV4=n, CONFIG_IPV6=y and
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y. That becomes possible once "ipv4: make
CONFIG_IPV4 boolean" later in this series makes IPV4 selectable. Won't
IPv6 multipath hashing then keep using a random seed that userspace can
no longer set?
There is no net.ipv6 copy of this seed. net/ipv6/sysctl_net_ipv6.c only
has its own fib_multipath_hash_policy. The NETEVENT_IPV4_MPATH_HASH_UPDATE
notification sent from proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed() for offload drivers
would also never be sent.
Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst describes this sysctl as:
The seed value used when calculating hash for multipath routes. Applies
to both IPv4 and IPv6 datapath. Only present for kernels built with
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH enabled.
proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed() is marked __maybe_unused in this patch.
That suggests the IPV4=n with IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y case was expected.
Should this entry stay outside the CONFIG_IPV4 block, guarded only by
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH?
> + {
> + .procname = "fib_notify_on_flag_change",
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260930135334.4739-1-fmancera%40suse.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260930135334.4739-1-fmancera@suse.de>
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 01/16 net-next v3] ipv4: introduce CONFIG_IPV4 to decouple the IPv4 stack Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 02/16 net-next v3] net: core: add IPv4 fallback stubs and guards for CONFIG_IPV4=n Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 03/16 net-next v3] net: inet: relocate ip_generic_getfrag and guard IPv4 socket logic Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 04/16 net-next v3] tcp: move protocol agnostic TCP functions out of tcp_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 05/16 net-next v3] ipv4: raw: split IPv4 specific logic into raw_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 06/16 net-next v3] ipv4: udp: split IPv4 specific logic into udp_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 07/16 net-next v3] ipv4: icmp: split IPv4 specific logic into icmp_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 08/16 net-next v3] ipv4: ping: split IPv4 specific logic into ping_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 09/16 net-next v3] ipv4: fib: split common nexthop logic to fib_core.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 10/16 net-next v3] tunnels: guard IPv4 tunnel functions with CONFIG_IPV4 Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 11/16 net-next v3] ipv4: disable IPv4-only sysctls when CONFIG_IPV4=n Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 12/16 net-next v3] netfilter: ipv4: guard ip_route_me_harder() with CONFIG_IPV4 Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 13/16 net-next v3] net: bridge: guard ARP/RARP proxy and suppression " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 14/16 net-next v3] wifi: mac80211: replace CONFIG_INET with CONFIG_IPV4 guards Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 15/16 net-next v3] netlabel: cipso: introduce CONFIG_CIPSO to decouple IPv4 dependency Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-30 13:52 ` [PATCH 16/16 net-next v3] ipv4: make CONFIG_IPV4 boolean Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-04 17:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179113455439.434549.2885225995379440090@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®