mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Velkov <iav@iav.lv>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Igor Velkov <iav@iav.lv>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] genirq/kexec: Do not take the bus lock of an interrupt chip on the crash path
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 07:04:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1791173042898471846.39598@iav.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005014155.BD56B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>

On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 01:41:55 +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> If an irqchip implements irq_bus_sync_unlock but omits irq_bus_lock, this
> condition evaluates to true and irq_set_irqchip_state() is called.
[...]
> Should this check also ensure !chip->irq_bus_sync_unlock?

Yes. The next version will test both callbacks, as irq_supports_nmi()
does. No chip in tip/irq/core sets only one of them, as far as I can
grep, so nothing changes for current users.

Igor

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-05  1:22 Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-05  1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-05  4:04   ` Igor Velkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1791173042898471846.39598@iav.lv \
    --to=iav@iav.lv \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=farbere@amazon.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=radu@rendec.net \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®