From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAD9367F58; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791207208; cv=none; b=crYVggdg8RMTv5yUzmef4nIcCGB0UaEmL8f+QXkA2rp+mNOMl2HNwqVvYgOCGhnaRS99P7a2COzmDovNL4JuKa7g/IvkzrabyrvieQanzZMpEXjcoUOUkpLmfKQcmObiDEq99iugJy6LG5sOAiv2VoMxAqhhfxSr6OC6tB20vSs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791207208; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=WJO5F9rpC9tGjF4HqSDf3zjvOrPxWGveD/MFDQ1SuP5gcxGkqelU+ocq//a26cnB59ZWd1TKPlg60cpZkoiR/W4ZqGrmIJf7YLSKWVInHGCzB+sVp7aNYoBJjj/nwTB1TXCCg6ymTQl5NrJVYCdx2rGvKZn9Jlg+qEPcDQhKLfw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=d6hUQZTm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="d6hUQZTm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3729C1F000FF; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:33:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791207206; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=d6hUQZTmy582RZL+XJZs4XU8LYvv6PeOlMdPaHw6dKHyMbe3gG96a/oXatFeG/1+f aA3U6dLtYE/r3nFLP7KB07mjn/1ye+sMEDaYWCDBGFMuxjg5s15cu9MnkswwgjZEG8 f7ikAlJjotYmFSxvW71OBIevW8eOmzhg3VwYKU3AUDqJjmjpp/okxGTvS88qhUYv7h OflvNVhGM8LvcPuE1J33vtlYlmSyxQA8XySg9DVyahYcpQjavDh3crjYzWgH6GurQP xxhHjtw/gvh+b3YihgHeh+uR3PBqM7HeEFBKpEW074TIovSRUoLjtVkf5FpkMzfsUJ 6qaGOdNfyB+7Q== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=96mer?= Mete Kaya Cc: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, david@ixit.cz, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: nci: fix out-of-bounds read in nci_core_reset_rsp_packet() Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 13:33:25 +0000 Message-ID: <179120720574.1402591.13582434920799046722@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261005132742.324374-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> References: <20261005132742.324374-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.