From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D9437F739; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 20:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791320114; cv=none; b=Ebq4qsL/uDFFeKQ/WD/Djufxcxvv/PfBuXYjFTB5nziNV/Hr8i0YfuK1r3TBUxcHbk6DxSmawVuHB9Y57APZBUyCbOSkUaq73VtOHIvWb6RqFRTplHFz83Jrp2TCZWTmLeQCmRceWZo7y39x5qTzatvT0qXkEXl4NkzRjo8Ayac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791320114; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=H3bSSSKGP1bUd8ZPU38HrUK+zw3X9Y3YNGcCMA1cU+7yhrqCTFysz5XnlUX/NYnAG//q7/9SxSPkl0H7ZEi3mN/LFQMblW0+ta55QNJMjCLTVhVXnWKayxBf5qdQ75whR3Xa3C6NcNeN8pIkZEeb3Za9Gl5VliDmtm5X9el0E2I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dQagaFuq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dQagaFuq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07A9B1F0089B; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791320112; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=dQagaFuqQLNB9IDq7PyswQEZwFixksVTSJNLbkJ3k3dXZY7XNqJU/c96bflC0wLbj fBzlRQBVod/008Hw9TdXhnfddMlgkP4qUMOOPWBKVM0Mgmai/8ZKuddiv7ivhXt4kq y9E6/9IMoiyHCTYQPLCtHq/JHq6vs+OhAmQRkeQ0Mvsn52iUa2piY/br2QFQ8YnHh1 HfOrePE38TXKhidUO4Ue0A+62Uw7r3aZifuF0WQ42iYkKKBwHTZrqgjJvZVhYUYAlq dINmFBWkWDpjwpLwzIC8yWxZbmz2IvwzSSXg8+bSVM4XGqNj0zraD4RsQFf0G8z/7n soH/BlNYQtjHA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: sungbyeongchan Cc: Allison Henderson , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andy Grover , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] RDS/IB: validate receive completion payload length Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 20:55:11 +0000 Message-ID: <179132011155.2231598.14821411537905810702@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261006205204.1322102-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> References: <20261006205204.1322102-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.