From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88905418340; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 08:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791363375; cv=none; b=UXq2mHgfcqvtCdZKIF7hTNaiMT5ljuCuSSP2Gg+J0c5NJu657jBwYVuyFGFB9wytp1IDfx0WxAapLveMLtkruemsTMvGbn1oJkZ6HhSJfgG1G/wopL2MTed7GpG+AeyWMx+eqaulNominjjxdjN9/HSa90XIDSRHrcZA1nbxgNQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791363375; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T80pmibn7aSi6N9hDzJvCBDoLXDCN4HDH9fhrQVJ60g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=m2bpGziowGOD4IqwgT/d8yo+SSnd1R1b9V/+Sed5gjNllrChBA6Gn1a7kpzCqKEWqNzwDY4soe99MHpf1rfTINhs5p3J0MXT35HApOURNKIJE3CPcQLyveVcjPldLf8CqFMte+Pdlp4dT8h3/hi7x6mj+iprp/cJTpI2zm7YoLM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=odVzmI6J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="odVzmI6J" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4472D1F0089B; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 08:56:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791363374; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=odVzmI6J3aG13jtfoB+xU8DJnQc2Z73iZZ9UfV9ouNOhz6s2l5yFfnmqmvq2CqzaS 6u0CpkgM+sOIJFkuOot22Cizd4yku7ftPaZ4WN8KrD8Z0L57lPmT2t9kLP6DeMp0jY IHdUwIz6rJxWy6nr6PFY2mdNxsqruaQuFBE6z2vx1fIKqcH3QXQFM6OcklbMgpON7N uoV+niBOmxCuiWbGDiAqSja5gr8/LxyFRq3VrQ8qW2WaaHQqsbAV30S3K1/cl0zWOx 4E4fVmuz1bdEoSYORIkyRmYYCURgflxOEWQ6rfikLS38XuJPJtJoHSEVyq3NSGQRpQ GYwMArtEqrGow== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Nicolai Buchwitz Cc: Doug Berger , Florian Fainelli , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Stevenson , Justin Chen , Pierre-Marin Leclercq , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] net: bcmgenet: support larger MTUs Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:56:12 +0000 Message-ID: <179136337262.2527009.9220130121409362777@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261007-nb-genet-mtu-nn-v2-v3-0-74a796c019ce@tipi-net.de> References: <20261007-nb-genet-mtu-nn-v2-v3-0-74a796c019ce@tipi-net.de> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.