From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7CC3AE6F5; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 03:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791431957; cv=none; b=CV4OOZqCOwC2mDlIAwxb/MwoJIslz4GoGXJ4jV3tdKPIUmk+GBsrsuiO999ePr9zN9Oa8F/mqgBSl19MY4lo54d0UmydNiJQDJBrb7LyJO3V2ib+N+Q5yVhjEh4zVG/SRMJfp6phJwfr50KXfv80OM4QFWOUicsH5ShFcfIh95A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791431957; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=mWMnLFXJf5hC6mk5PsRXzvv35FxtjLMziMz/Faa0q65nD69e+bqqxOMN9OLpSawU8Tiep9WW1ocD9SfIzAFOSClXJuMywYoK+rnSWsaodvxj91gW/Yl3jkpfEKY3szHn5JhYLjRoA1EFjBzxbFkXxYMduyqz6nWMBnZTvZX6FYU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WfmmtHpS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WfmmtHpS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E81331F000FF; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 03:59:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791431956; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=WfmmtHpS/Myhydt/TVyMFReRPcy1QMHKlSXn/o/jQz0KRnRG9mwUSC2zyzNttD8tw snu/KwVceaOyNVT7W07YFFfMk1DijvxKGrt/dKLv+kse8hK40mSBYmYnRdK4GcIzwu IZTEzgINbj9OslJJSjhb0d5AZK/UB5PsGU/FGMft0r9RVCSpKpw1wk0QoRfyQ9nSLJ YocYbQtdrhTItOYe/800MrHAgOw4I7BPQiVGTke0JBV3nFr4xbafrrGLmjpv5d1LGD Woi3ijbasF+/gko3jAU3I3Bjn6zW6U/Sn8/Ow4MxNLO4UU+TjIi0QJEcarlTZTarI+ hWiDcdIaPw6jg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Bui Viet Dung Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: sch_netem: prevent packet length underflow with negative overhead Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:59:15 +0000 Message-ID: <179143195544.2527009.14860370525417657852@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261008035656.330667-1-dungvn2345@gmail.com> References: <20261008035656.330667-1-dungvn2345@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.