From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B68A361DD5; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 17:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791481166; cv=none; b=rqI913uYK3HozVzKymVDaYwDbe8xnq/NBnGa/tDXGBlLKBrbQwT2Cw/wXecIWbPalXr/4Yw2nbfrfCrvAEEF+4ACs2lx2QYojyxAxYxLloHmCGcnIRTLE/W1j6MD34O/fMyPMom2xKqTLKTMNjrdczOfY5hN/jV4kohBwbnx/DQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791481166; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Frc+ADQTxRwKDWaoqMQMlUJQ/gCXB8qyIs31/48aD70=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=EOMg4+d8k809k6ON3Iq79/9ZTuXhBs684OMtpCx6Oz8y4BXgUzPdgkLazrj6xdRQTVjjvmK5euo86vKh4TS7/A/00Fb0WIBZxR8t3wFHN55QmNb+JsBSj7x5pg+wdHV7x+cwGDN9ODb0v1o42Q21uHnHbjg8XhNrONwuBW6kFxo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X5iLpbw6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X5iLpbw6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 136D81F000FF; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 17:39:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791481165; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=X5iLpbw6ZvPsVQcm1i9uR0IUH4lHs47JRJ+ZzUoEowb+hsrwsUKYAm5at+xwt0PWh HsA8ibxrjSglGQRjC4UwaQLl675aRl50XrFx371LXCsBE2X7ppx1TNvfAt6iG5h75p nalcZ2u835mwk7/muFfEaGpuCKbKnzptU9J10/Xf5qn+H7Hv/vbcqlQABjxKL822K8 kZNeiRziAltZGDBIxCbmdfbZqSATLBllsJGbIc5rKkAOyGWrcCcCfAH9mwkzZ86kPE Z28ZgS71Lw86I2EDlnvi+QyaD3AVtj28M2t8nsPRVm3pa/DgSUbr2Q3KcHKJ6AKQVG j4uR4MmFu0qqA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Brian Vazquez Cc: Brian Vazquez , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Madhu Chittim , Pavan Kumar Linga , Joshua Hay , Shailendra Bhatnagar , Sridhar Samudrala , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Decotigny , Li Li , Emil Tantilov Subject: Re: [iwl-net PATCH] idpf: wait for the reset completed state in idpf_check_reset_complete() Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 17:39:23 +0000 Message-ID: <179148116354.2527009.2591065698849960120@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261008173334.2881475-1-brianvv@google.com> References: <20261008173334.2881475-1-brianvv@google.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.