From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB263BBFCC; Sun, 11 Oct 2026 05:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791696288; cv=none; b=rX1VAMjjmlwfCZVuPiD/FcON3Ou2thdUnCgFs4jVSGGNhaCXTQEb0LRksL5ZXzz2oWTDeQxJQIc699P1CSY4cvyFy4/O9UQMMbjqM15ZjQIKbHudLFprjBzwzrBY5bv5qOxuOInvg5rvSxK4uUgy0V6Z7f0SHoGX5myCuZD9r44= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791696288; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=oXqNfi8ysmKCV6DjotnqTvaEflgALHRJAH88+CyGcfkbdM0I5OlLGkllT9Qx4I3kcZ8GSQuK6LRSS0xw09a+A1jFELgHZ90n5fr+D/23BNWx8oIOq1+2GN/O4xxOWbU8tFQ4Wef8cQmY1fTCYgyf/XXEeq9/uR6HLvBde2JaoC0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Pg4oZaFn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Pg4oZaFn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8C0C1F0089B; Sun, 11 Oct 2026 05:24:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791696287; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Pg4oZaFn+kLF0NZ4UeZ+KQneQmtfNqJL890viQosw/oPv+sBo8qx/F7BLLTc7n5wX TSdUZHgmEJ4P70bmvdekedD8LkUJleKGSo+vhxrk8EssmlZJywUReOrypTWOTU5sNP AHajgA94wQjE3GEWdU7oPhiaK/cz3ZAOojMRqNsYRbbBe5xkiZtd3kBkaB4S5hkXnK xKBSW/0H5y/GtQU+jNNrU/G+oWIW0w++hSQ/nuISD3yykjVpF+kbXzwlUh/DpqtJl+ dMZ546mOGzyRk+xOhPKM7C46IN6Q6pWZZXWJYQ8HhPHipSZOL8wOD+OCaO1J+yOGBf W0cExRZlVAhfQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Shashank Mohan Jain Cc: Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , "David S. Miller" , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: keep the route window metric when SO_RCVBUF is set before connect Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 05:24:46 +0000 Message-ID: <179169628642.2527009.18099159731266030842@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261011052006.60585-1-jain.sm@gmail.com> References: <20261011052006.60585-1-jain.sm@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.