From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A00736F8FE; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791790239; cv=none; b=MZxnBSWlRzqcT6Q/wHfqK6AUtGNIN6jN6VlSM9ATkgf6Om7vocd+H2DFP6Pt/SgtlW3CDW5LnB8CZkr9ifsGZS7mr7ANVKdKc+1Ko9TxcLSBYHSKiU2rALiuxa2aZsZJ1sWThXfjfN3u7iCLI0KYwwYFwAH4sp93GCbRnSvr6Vo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791790239; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=g/0dixHBq9TEMKoSNALm0KEp5fL8DXFvMAzXUdCVB5jVTgssMz6eSWoG9juIwgWiD8OQFBLGayLxH2dohQTtni2KLLX60Vpib/F1tsjlyNKv7XlY32Qe8kUdIV/LDgqCJVKrdcDdHWLqkAHq22V7axhaUxHi14hfziv0loLs2lA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lyvDdFcJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lyvDdFcJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E86B11F0089E; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:30:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791790238; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=lyvDdFcJ1mHVYVQ190Nc0LXAcbD3tesD/0/fnIy1MNYYBgXIdDi6ligSIKeddFwsS vKm60IMUkvmR/gSwKX85bzhQBDiciR/mH8rdCSy4RpWZimrmvBNcd4IBf5+9NopQfn Udk+pn6c0NVSsUhCvZJxj6lrAae0kTawYDfh4DxU1Uwn/nPDjatyFmcD0943Xzcy7D WHaZ/I8XvTHDe3c5AJ6mAj5ExjDcl+WqHcQnOT/MsvwedLKNc9Nf6/GY7Fty5A3DsW NU0fJVsPuJ8S7tkz/vs0Qhg0ehFT8RBQN70NPwEgIfkHiO8mBRLqn7cKwsBXG6l5X/ 4qU0djbai33Eg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Guo Zihao Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Florian Westphal , Phil Sutter , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v3 1/2] netfilter: ebtables: ebt_802_3: check the LLC fields before reading them Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:30:37 +0000 Message-ID: <179179023747.2527009.10483751544394941789@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261012072449.3240201-1-guozh23@xiaopeng.com> References: <20261012072449.3240201-1-guozh23@xiaopeng.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.