From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3F94657EA; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791794061; cv=none; b=YLlyBMVv8pvHy+Y75qCGIsmcmr+apMaaO9w+tBRFzVCTQJycdcC8omEEy3oIi/oWQe2Dtyimfoplu+UzxB9gMu0gbD+QwTGZlIh6pwesN6hnZoj1u3qm9njIVkCG0HhHbFr/eBrRVckQ6tjF6P2rG4gIfL9qVcuR7wDCAx8gP4c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791794061; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Frc+ADQTxRwKDWaoqMQMlUJQ/gCXB8qyIs31/48aD70=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Q9M+4TzfyewQOMPFz/6QALCAwHyUmcEtkx0IjB5idq86cn5Wzp36hHJXw5hA4qaoIaKuZM8X1dbNZa1nb/Sd6ceYvy4GG5v6jkb0SxQHRv3lRl4qsPf86/b67FSsrHqlELoJ7jUCiWvqwEHypBmj2SQ1kUdVUlNo0YgHmElwrS4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TU1O25BR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TU1O25BR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71EF11F0089B; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:34:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791794059; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=TU1O25BR+UKhvp7Ujpo7e//H0M2tFSdFcAV6Jo9wfl6vZXBnsSR6BJyQCVERDHjQj va32iT6qEPovrNp7FS0mYz19BBe5b45aLHfJvtgrUiIUBSfMu738c2laZNx02zitQ/ BuLjzDth6Bg0CYa6DyE/3ZNJUt6nr27alYFQhPkEO5VZZ7c76NxqFd16MctRMA1msB BITZ+pC2zFd22Kv+c8AFbXpcWzFyFrMw2zyEH+DhUasZvqJS4sBcInbWm53pkwJLW+ AftFaA/il5oXFArG8lZXxZe4kWyfFSCrz689wpW9EsWqKV3b2uvMKfoQEhLDuIVdis xJflm8ePbruNQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Linkui Xiao Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linkui Xiao Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] ice: do not report success for a VF setting that was not applied Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:34:18 +0000 Message-ID: <179179405801.2527009.14010952920802573492@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261012082910.283229-1-xiaolinkui@126.com> References: <20261012082910.283229-1-xiaolinkui@126.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.