From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8025363C53; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791854121; cv=none; b=jFRNLEZ3y2liyNSgorXh0UdwRu24J78gSS8Q0bJIPbQ2BCkNQHk92xdiKJ/XWiUMBbPK+7IurKviTLzMg9NuHi7NyzvD7tj+Z0X57znWeN5y5nXqmLS1sVP56hFJ912aXLJVY7Ex755u92D9SWA+1LdCwqXiwfhaFx1OX9vyQ5s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791854121; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=aJjjUn/l3mU57qIgF9TvpvRo8mVoY2LKcgAlTPDlWrnTtEl92+h668TTg9a8oqRb8l0fLPu+uN9UcWm/9u1+QotecucA/AAWiZm6M86ztxv4ke5ZEbCDu8VoGz23A8V7IoOAdYkgW/m99lgbk4YHjNG6O8jIv0uJyK2WazXQm4k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NPFYbJOo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NPFYbJOo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B10E81F0089B; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:15:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791854120; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NPFYbJOo+N/pyhUfJOjVCp0P1q4q1Dc8eoOB88zAggOtYW3Qx8GwO7Nsn60RTTQNQ PFOl/ti4qfYLllfHXiAdMWTORs0NvvKewlOBOMGfzGtB/9RKrrDsuuxftYp1QryoxI dg6Iw+ID2WtTLBGQBYJacHHOKF6QZdccmhC6Qs0+ciNgWtiOgaCP1MqNEle0mo8zzR MvPUevGIE4O6A/kSE+9L/NL9rgj762KGWJ+mv9itMs2aVJGuP7qlM4z7VXGv8Fkbr0 v7ByqQZnqsUoSD9V/JLlJd7nXrbdBaNVinIzsZSSB/HiZ73Nc5OZetzbs5GKQ/UUzt xHBIg0XR1z1xQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Paul Moses Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, avigailx.dahan@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] igc: only strip RX timestamp header from first buffer Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:15:19 +0000 Message-ID: <179185411924.2527009.3756808928521081401@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261013010854.4068874-1-p@1g4.org> References: <20261013010854.4068874-1-p@1g4.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.