From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9A72F6918; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791942014; cv=none; b=dmX53U1LWqroYA4kI7Ak4NpA6yTjEoCpI2P47BHviZ2wpy1bIl3mUcC2pOkPuqH1hmRf9CU35z+ZT1BxNSU4JYuWALB5MDJ1rEXN/+0Gsmbj2if1XpB+vPpvxKYzcUzylUOZeIRmO9xR3htpQ+XKAEk+zq/804cpwlWEhIDWP0g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791942014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=XqoXXUPdlt6gZonvjG5b00p2tWMp1Q/LdOIfClDG04fA7iYIqUdXGTxu0OJm41N/S4RAfnx1D8PYLKOl8mzmW1Wwxip4PXta8B8xd0jL32uy5i5+bfoldsSnt9hKKppOPqlJ6MG8RszREEPrfqs8RL4KcTGnXZIxOWM0BHgrVPA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Y+W62/Ld; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y+W62/Ld" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E22C1F000FF; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:40:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791942012; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Y+W62/LdnsswkNjlkyQ7I8GGLCKM5DC53f3rZev2bJYa7nmNflLssYNZwQv1MFP1i FH4nsEl1e4dS2gSmwIh0FbBhVsmoflchIs3IWxqzb9XviYcfdlTSDefrdWs6z7b/AY HZ1ToF8IfvJNOVqnuSufu4wjwbtvOjj5DwrubyCIg884w4Ep04edn1NKNUnkKQsIRI 46j6Z6HESpHx1ovGbdxoFZvb6oMtegFxXxcRbgdp41xmAw6pwtU30Z+pYkAHN+p7JK OsRme/p407PPnlwNfD6csY52dWSg1lj077dbYH/tis67xxHj5qNVQJ722ECe0XN16s TjM1hGKn9UCxA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: lirongqing Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] veth: decide peer queue count from the peer's own attributes Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:40:11 +0000 Message-ID: <179194201171.160550.1001715704134094403@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261014013620.2497-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> References: <20261014013620.2497-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.