From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE13C47F79B; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792051783; cv=none; b=c+Sd8Rp6F6q87RBtjX2uPErp4fJCAGERCFsEQmZofA9EPp+djO18V6iQCAs+VwnNLbL+BA/BT7LIGva1XAficaV1OWWroNj0+j4Rdg1/BBjWN1XnoIOQTpUp5RgcX4GrktErNLqcqBACVRCiAPs2tCRlE29QksoDl+jz0dvZ2xc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792051783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=bjqSD8C7MDUIFqm2Bf2xQofA6PIhKhJ9gOcjrIvHhk6Y/TcYKvmGmiuICmd3yH/8z1ynkvnvMDgQeW7ewq595g49rVhcnzuMFYOXPJu01wHcRlCaQuEzR9X/YEoNMUyQpOTyRAd8g8ZeRwEpFC8Y3d0XlCgg4QNZHINLlmbogPQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GlSIYaMn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GlSIYaMn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 461291F000C4; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:09:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792051782; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=GlSIYaMnzOqXLt4ERkB23djhcjITbTnv3qlZenzf7zo3MajqrE9FXsnsq8LDXJ6/J 78SY/bWLHigtpz7D+p6p0pFw9pKkr699Ga/RSpIB+sRo4CWWHr8DZWFkk7NNmaMDtB dPGthuG/y2RxXJDx2n+1wiWzfStvmwRCbLcjAoVQTlfRVLAoTTvguuzhenLxtwnnw7 7MSwoChwTw6m46CtOIBl2NpB2Q3naei3TzwO2bHeXqgr18zo368qODzl5GSmUSRSYC EUkgWknEAgFFLhYezvcKG/H7h8hauJ2/XlNDVPgtoYXZxHCwK7RS8gjkvKSeHhrtbf OQT/7h0pSPpfA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Alex Lazar , Carolina Jubran , Cosmin Ratiu , Dragos Tatulea , Gal Pressman , Kees Cook , Leon Romanovsky , open list , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Mark Bloch , Richard Cochran , Saeed Mahameed , Shahar Shitrit Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Fix NULL deref in PTP TX timestamp recovery warn Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:09:40 +0000 Message-ID: <179205178078.408196.12399315538524843906@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261015080218.1102172-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261015080218.1102172-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.