From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: cbabroski@nvidia.com
Cc: bryan.whitehead@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com,
Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com, davthompson@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/5] net: lan743x: reset DMA channels that fail to stop
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:34:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179242764415.3135.15367182924729818631@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3Cbf487e5d01fe6352069d4314087f680fea717cc5=2E1792008?= =?utf-8?q?404=2Egit=2Ecbabroski=40nvidia=2Ecom=3E?=
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider.
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 (1) · Low: 0
If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
(one such reply per series is enough).
- [High] The patch does not fully close the bug it targets.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] lan743x_tx_open() and lan743x_rx_open() now use the new
lan743x_dmac_{tx,rx}_reset() helpers, but on -ETIMEDOUT they only call…
--
net: lan743x: reset DMA channels that fail to stop
This patch makes lan743x_tx_close() and lan743x_rx_close() check the
result of waiting for the DMA channel to stop. If the channel is still
stop-pending or still started, they now issue a channel soft reset. The
reset sequence is moved into lan743x_dmac_tx_reset() and
lan743x_dmac_rx_reset(), and the open paths use these helpers and log a
message if the reset times out.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
> index 82d3ec20ba259..9e1276cf313c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2221,11 +2239,22 @@ static int lan743x_tx_ring_init(struct lan743x_tx *tx)
> static void lan743x_tx_close(struct lan743x_tx *tx)
> {
> struct lan743x_adapter *adapter = tx->adapter;
> + int ret;
>
> lan743x_csr_write(adapter,
> DMAC_CMD,
> DMAC_CMD_STOP_T_(tx->channel_number));
> - lan743x_dmac_tx_wait_till_stopped(adapter, tx->channel_number);
> + ret = lan743x_dmac_tx_wait_till_stopped(adapter, tx->channel_number);
> + if (ret < 0 || ret == DMAC_CHANNEL_STATE_STARTED) {
> + netdev_warn(adapter->netdev,
> + "TX channel %d failed to stop, resetting it\n",
> + tx->channel_number);
> + ret = lan743x_dmac_tx_reset(adapter, tx->channel_number);
> + if (ret)
> + netdev_err(adapter->netdev,
> + "TX channel %d reset timed out\n",
> + tx->channel_number);
> + }
[Severity: High]
What happens if this channel reset also times out?
The commit message says the soft reset is issued "and wait for it before
anything is freed". However, if lan743x_dmac_tx_reset() returns -ETIMEDOUT,
the code only logs it, and lan743x_tx_close() goes on with the normal
teardown:
lan743x_tx_close()
...
lan743x_tx_release_all_descriptors(tx); /* unmap and free skbs */
...
lan743x_tx_ring_cleanup(tx); /* dma_free_coherent() ring and head */
The commit message describes a wedged channel that may not honour the stop
request. Could that channel ignore the soft reset as well? It would then
keep fetching descriptors from, or writing the head index into, memory that
has already been freed and reused.
lan743x_rx_close() has the same pattern. After a timed-out RX reset,
lan743x_rx_ring_cleanup() unmaps and frees every RX skb, even though their
descriptors still have OWN set. It then frees the descriptor ring and the
head write-back buffer. On RX, the device could write packet data into
freed pages.
Later in the series, "net: lan743x: reset the device on TX timeout" does not
change this. It runs the global DMAC reset (DMAC_CMD_SWR_) from
lan743x_reset_work() only after lan743x_netdev_close() has already freed the
rings. A plain ifdown never reaches that reset at all.
Could the close paths act on the reset failure before freeing anything?
One option is to escalate to the global DMAC_CMD_SWR_ reset or clear PCI
bus mastering. Another is to leak the ring, the head buffer and the mapped
buffers when the channel can't be shown to be quiesced.
[ ... ]
> @@ -2271,11 +2300,11 @@ static int lan743x_tx_open(struct lan743x_tx *tx)
> FCT_TX_CTL_EN_(tx->channel_number));
>
> /* reset tx channel */
> - lan743x_csr_write(adapter, DMAC_CMD,
> - DMAC_CMD_TX_SWR_(tx->channel_number));
> - lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit(adapter, DMAC_CMD,
> - DMAC_CMD_TX_SWR_(tx->channel_number),
> - 0, 1000, 20000, 100);
> + ret = lan743x_dmac_tx_reset(adapter, tx->channel_number);
> + if (ret)
> + netdev_err(adapter->netdev,
> + "TX channel %d reset timed out\n",
> + tx->channel_number);
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue and was not introduced by this patch. The old
code also discarded the return value of lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit(), and
this change only adds a log message.
After a failed reset, lan743x_tx_open() still programs TX_BASE_ADDR,
TX_HEAD_WRITEBACK_ADDR, TX_CFG_A/B/C and TX_TAIL. It then writes
DMAC_CMD_START_T_ and returns 0.
Can the interface come up on a channel whose soft reset never finished?
If the reset completes late, the register writes made while it was pending
may be lost or wiped.
lan743x_rx_open() handles the reset the same way. There, if RX_HEAD is
non-zero after a failed RX reset, the code takes this path:
rx->last_head = lan743x_csr_read(adapter, RX_HEAD(rx->channel_number));
if (rx->last_head) {
ret = -EIO;
goto napi_delete;
}
That reaches lan743x_rx_ring_cleanup() without the stop and reset handling
that this patch adds to lan743x_rx_close().
Should the open paths return an error when the channel reset times out?
>
> /* Write TX_BASE_ADDR */
> lan743x_csr_write(adapter,
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/cover.1792008404.git.cbabroski%40nvidia.com
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 16:34 netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-15 15:00 [PATCH net-next v1 0/5] net: lan743x: automatically recover from TX hang Chris Babroski
2026-10-15 15:00 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/5] net: lan743x: reset DMA channels that fail to stop Chris Babroski
2026-10-19 10:18 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179242764415.3135.15367182924729818631@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bryan.whitehead@microchip.com \
--cc=cbabroski@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davthompson@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®